Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571304›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

A Little Bird Told Me… Nutri-Score Panoramas from a Flight over Europe, Connecting Science and Society.

Alice Stiletto, Leonardo Cei, Samuele Trestini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice StilettoDepartment of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Leonardo CeiDepartment of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-0716
Samuele TrestiniDepartment of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-8262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the Farm to Fork Strategy, the European Commission ask for a unified Front Of Pack nutritional label for food to be used at the European level. The scientific debate identified the Nutri-Score (NS) as the most promising candidate, but within the political discussion, some Member States brought to attention several issues related to its introduction. This misalignment led to a postponement of the final decision. With the aim to shed some light on the current stances and contribute to the forthcoming debate, the objective of the present work is to understand to what extent scientific research addresses the issues raised by the general public. We applied a structural topic model to tweets from four European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain) and to abstracts of scientific papers, all dealing with the NS topic. Different aspects of the NS debate are discussed in different countries, but scientific research, while addressing some of them (e.g., the comparison between NS and other labels), disregards others (e.g., relations between NS and traditional products). It is advisable, therefore, to widen the scope of NS research to properly address the concerns of European society and to provide policymakers with robust evidence to support their decisions.

Indexed as

Food LabelingFood PreferencesConsumer BehaviorEuropeFranceNutritive ValueSpainconsumers preferencesfront of packnutritional labelsystematic literature reviewtopic model analysisTwitter analysis

Identifiers

PMID37571304
PMCPMC10421117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.