Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571289›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

How the Gus Schumacher Produce Prescription Program Works: An Adaptation of a Nutrition Incentive Theory of Change.

Sarah A Stotz, Nadine Budd Nugent, Melissa Akers, Kirsten Leng, Carmen Byker Shanks, Amy L Yaroch, James Krieger, Morgan Szczepaniak, Hilary Seligman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah A StotzCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-3313
Nadine Budd NugentGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68154, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7482-012X
Melissa AkersDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Kirsten LengHealthy Food America, Seattle, WA 98122, USA.
Carmen Byker ShanksGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68154, USA.
Amy L YarochGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68154, USA.
James KriegerHealthy Food America, Seattle, WA 98122, USA.
Morgan SzczepaniakGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68154, USA.
Hilary SeligmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2292-5189

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture no. 2019-70030-30415/project accession no. 1020863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States Department of Agriculture's Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP) supports nutrition incentive (NI) and produce prescription programs (PPRs). PPRs allow healthcare providers to "prescribe" fruits and vegetables (FVs) to patients experiencing low income and/or chronic disease(s) and who screen positive for food insecurity. We developed a Theory of Change (TOC) that summarizes how and why PPRs work, identifies what the programs hope to achieve, and elucidates the causal pathways necessary to achieve their goals. We created the PPR TOC through an iterative, participatory process that adapted our previously developed GusNIP NI TOC. The participatory process involved food and nutrition security experts, healthcare providers, PPR implementors, and PPR evaluators reviewing the existing NI TOC and suggesting modifications to accurately reflect PPRs. The resulting TOC describes the mechanisms, assumptions, rationale, and underpinnings that lead to successful and equitable outcomes. Modifications of the NI TOC centered around equity and focused on inclusion of healthcare as an additional partner and the importance of health and healthcare utilization as outcomes. The TOC describes how the GusNIP PPR program reaches its goals. This understanding will be useful for PPR developers, implementers, funders, and evaluators for describing the pathways, assumptions, and foundations of successful PPRs.

Indexed as

Food SupplyMotivationFruitHumansPrescriptionsUnited StatesVegetablesfood insecurityGus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP)low incomenutrition securityproduce prescriptiontheory of change

Identifiers

PMID37571289
PMCPMC10421213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.