Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571252›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Trend and Predictors of Breastmilk Feeding among Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants in NICU and at Discharge.

Pasqua Anna Quitadamo, Federica Zambianco, Giuseppina Palumbo, Massimiliano Copetti, Maria Assunta Gentile, Antonio Mondelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pasqua Anna QuitadamoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-8700
Federica ZambiancoSan Raffaele Faculty of Medicine, University of San Raffaele Vita-Salute, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Giuseppina PalumboNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Massimiliano CopettiStatistical Department, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Maria Assunta GentileNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Antonio MondelliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mothers' own milk (MOM) for premature babies is considered a life-saving drug for its proven protective action against the complications of prematurity and for effects on outcome in the short and long term, especially neurological ones. We studied the use of MOM for infants weighing <1500 g for a period of 5 years, evaluating the trend over time and the impact of some variables on human milk feeding performance. Statistical comparisons concerned the rate of feeding with breast milk during a stay in an NICU and at discharge with respect to two types of variables: (1) maternal and neonatal characteristics (gestational age, birth weight, type of pregnancy (whether single or twin), maternal age) and (2) feeding characteristics (time of the start of minimal enteral feeding and availability of MOM, days until the achievement of full enteral feeding). Group comparisons were performed using ANOVA or

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMilk, HumanFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMothersPatient DischargePregnancymothers’ own milkpreterm feedingVLBW

Identifiers

PMID37571252
PMCPMC10421341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.