Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571217›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Properties of Resorbable Conduits Based on Poly(L-Lactide) Nanofibers and Chitosan Fibers for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Nurjemal A Tagandurdyyeva, Maxim A Trube, Igor' O Shemyakin, Denis N Solomitskiy, German V Medvedev, Elena N Dresvyanina, Yulia A Nashchekina, Elena M Ivan'kova, Irina P Dobrovol'skaya, Almaz M Kamalov and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Nerve Coaptation in 2023: Adjuncts to Nerve Repair Beyond Suture.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nurjemal A TagandurdyyevaInstitute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnology, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytekhnicheskaya Str., 29, Saint Petersburg 195251, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6578-131X
Maxim A TrubeInstitute of Medicine, RUDN University, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 6, Moscow 117198, Russia.
Igor' O ShemyakinScientific Research Center, Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo Str., 6-8, Saint Petersburg 197022, Russia.
Denis N SolomitskiyScientific Research Center, Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo Str., 6-8, Saint Petersburg 197022, Russia.
German V MedvedevMedsi Clinic, Department of Plastic Surgery, Marata Str., 6A, Saint Petersburg 191025, Russia.
Elena N DresvyaninaInstitute of Textile and Fashion, Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design, B. Morskaya Str., 18, Saint Petersburg 191186, Russia.
Yulia A NashchekinaCell Technologies Center, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretsky Ave., 4, Saint Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Elena M Ivan'kovaLaboratory of Mechanics of Polymers and Composites, Institute of Macromolecular Compounds Russian Academy of Science, Bol'shoi Prospect V.O. 31, Saint Petersburg 199004, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4823-0695
Irina P Dobrovol'skayaLaboratory of Mechanics of Polymers and Composites, Institute of Macromolecular Compounds Russian Academy of Science, Bol'shoi Prospect V.O. 31, Saint Petersburg 199004, Russia.
Almaz M KamalovInstitute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnology, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytekhnicheskaya Str., 29, Saint Petersburg 195251, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2044-957X
Elena G SukhorukovaScientific Research Center, Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo Str., 6-8, Saint Petersburg 197022, Russia.
Olga A MoskalyukLaboratory of Polymer and Composite Materials-SmartTextiles, IRC-X-ray Coherent Optics, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, A. Nevskogo Str., 14, Kaliningrad 236041, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1057-5989
Vladimir E YudinLaboratory of Mechanics of Polymers and Composites, Institute of Macromolecular Compounds Russian Academy of Science, Bol'shoi Prospect V.O. 31, Saint Petersburg 199004, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education "Priority 2030" (Agreement 075-15-2023-380 dated 20.02.2023)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New tubular conduits have been developed for the regeneration of peripheral nerves and the repair of defects that are larger than 3 cm. The conduits consist of a combination of poly(L-lactide) nanofibers and chitosan composite fibers with chitin nanofibrils. In vitro studies were conducted to assess the biocompatibility of the conduits using human embryonic bone marrow stromal cells (FetMSCs). The studies revealed good adhesion and differentiation of the cells on the conduits just one day after cultivation. Furthermore, an in vivo study was carried out to evaluate motor-coordination disorders using the sciatic nerve functional index (SFI) assessment. The presence of chitosan monofibers and chitosan composite fibers with chitin nanofibrils in the conduit design increased the regeneration rate of the sciatic nerve, with an SFI value ranging from 76 to 83. The degree of recovery of nerve conduction was measured by the amplitude of M-response, which showed a 46% improvement. The conduit design imitates the oriented architecture of the nerve, facilitates electrical communication between the damaged nerve's ends, and promotes the direction of nerve growth, thereby increasing the regeneration rate.

Indexed as

chitin nanofibrilschitosan fibersconduitperipheral nerve fiberspoly(L-lactide)regeneration

Identifiers

PMID37571217
PMCPMC10422266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.