Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571108›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

Review: Kirkwood-Riseman Model in Non-Dilute Polymeric Fluids.

George David Joseph Phillies

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

George David Joseph PhilliesDepartment of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-4361
Worcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In two prior articles, I demonstrated from extensive simulational studies by myself and others that the Rouse model of polymer dynamics is invalid in polymer melts and in dilute solution. However, the Rouse model is the foundational basis for most modern theories of polymeric fluid dynamics, such as reptation/scaling models. One therefore rationally asks whether there is a replacement. There is, namely by extending the Kirkwood-Riseman model. Here, I present a comprehensive review of one such set of extensions, namely the hydrodynamic scaling model. This model assumes that polymer dynamics in dilute and concentrated solution is dominated by solvent-mediated hydrodynamic interactions; chain crossing constraints are taken to create only secondary corrections. Many other models assume, contrariwise, that in concentrated solutions, the chain crossing constraints dominate the dynamics. An extended Kirkwood-Riseman model incorporating interchain hydrodynamic interactions is developed. It yields pseudovirial series for the concentration and molecular weight dependencies of the self-diffusion coefficient Ds and the low-shear viscosity η. To extrapolate to large concentrations, rationales based on self-similarity and on the Altenberger-Dahler positive-function renormalization group are presented. The rationales correctly predict how Ds and η depend on polymer concentration and molecular weight. The renormalization group approach leads to a two-parameter ansatz that correctly predicts the functional forms of the frequency dependencies of the storage and loss moduli. A short description is given of each of the papers that led to the hydrodynamic scaling model. Experiments supporting the aspects of the model are noted.

Indexed as

diffusionhydrodynamicshydrodynamic scaling modelmodels molecularmodels theoreticalpolymerpolymerspolymer solution dynamicssolutionviscosity

Identifiers

PMID37571108
PMCPMC10421467
OpenAlexW4385342299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.