Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37570898›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Miniaturization and Automation Protocol of a Urinary Organic Acid Liquid-Liquid Extraction Method on GC-MS.

Masauso Moses Phiri, Elmarie Davoren, Barend Christiaan Vorster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masauso Moses PhiriDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-7988
Elmarie DavorenCentre for Human Metabolomics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9490-7153
Barend Christiaan VorsterCentre for Human Metabolomics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-288X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to improve the extraction method for urinary organic acids by miniaturizing and automating the process. Currently, manual extraction methods are commonly used, which can be time-consuming and lead to variations in test results. To address these issues, we reassessed and miniaturized the in-house extraction method, reducing the number of steps and the sample-to-solvent volumes required. The evaluated miniaturized method was translated into an automated extraction procedure on a MicroLab (ML) Star (Hamilton Technologies) liquid handler. This was then validated using samples obtained from the ERNDIM External Quality Assurance program. The organic acid extraction method was successfully miniaturized and automated using the Autosampler robot. The linear range for most of the thirteen standard analytes fell between 0 to 300 mg/L in spiked synthetic urine, with low (50 mg/L), medium (100 mg/L), and high (500 mg/L) levels. The correlation coefficient (r) for most analytes was >0.99, indicating a strong relationship between the measured values. Furthermore, the automated extraction method demonstrated acceptable precision, as most organic acids had coefficients of variation (CVs) below 20%. In conclusion, the automated extraction method provided comparable or even superior results compared to the current in-house method. It has the potential to reduce solvent volumes used during extraction, increase sample throughput, and minimize variability and random errors in routine diagnostic settings.

Indexed as

Liquid-Liquid ExtractionAutomationGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMiniaturizationSolventsSolventsautomationliquid-liquid extractionmethod validationminiaturizationorganic acids

Identifiers

PMID37570898
PMCPMC10420839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.