ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Classification of Color Fundus Photographs Using Fusion Extracted Features and Customized CNN Models.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight multi-deep learning framework for accurate diabetic retinopathy detection and multi-level severity identification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of deep learning for detecting ophthalmic diseases with ultrawide-field fundus images.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- OpthaNet: Attention-Integrated Architecture for High-Precision Multi-Class Ophthalmic Image Classification.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on overcoming challenges in classifying eye diseases using color fundus photographs by leveraging deep learning techniques, aiming to enhance early detection and diagnosis accuracy. We utilized a dataset of 6392 color fundus photographs across eight disease categories, which was later augmented to 17,766 images. Five well-known convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-efficientnetb0, mobilenetv2, shufflenet, resnet50, and resnet101-and a custom-built CNN were integrated and trained on this dataset. Image sizes were standardized, and model performance was evaluated via accuracy, Kappa coefficient, and precision metrics. Shufflenet and efficientnetb0demonstrated strong performances, while our custom 17-layer CNN outperformed all with an accuracy of 0.930 and a Kappa coefficient of 0.920. Furthermore, we found that the fusion of image features with classical machine learning classifiers increased the performance, with Logistic Regression showcasing the best results. Our study highlights the potential of AI and deep learning models in accurately classifying eye diseases and demonstrates the efficacy of custom-built models and the fusion of deep learning and classical methods. Future work should focus on validating these methods across larger datasets and assessing their real-world applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.