ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023
The Internal Reliability and Construct Validity of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ): Evidence from Healthcare Professionals in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Readiness and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Among Physiotherapists: A Cross-Sectional Study and Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Green Transformational Leadership and Value-Action Barrier on Employees' Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Moderating Role of Green Brand Image in Chinese Food Manufacturing Enterprises.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and application of a scale for older patients' perceived ageist behavior of medical staff in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Undergraduate health sciences students' perceptions and practices of evidence-based practice: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of an Innovative Evidence-Based Practice Course.The Journal of nursing administration · 2025Article
- Development and validation of assistance needs assessment scale of the home-dwelling older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the antecedents affecting coping questionnaire in patients with multiple sclerosis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Reliability and Validity Measures of the Patellofemoral Subscale KOOS-PF in Greek Patients with Patellofemoral Pain.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- The work engagement and organizational silence among nurses: the mediating role of coworker support.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Determinants of Transitional Care Utilization Among Older Adults with Chronic Diseases: An Analysis Based on Andersen's Behavioral Model.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an evidence-based practice education workshop focused on critical appraisal for advanced practice nurses: A before-after intervention study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses: A sequential exploratory mixed method study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of the Companion's Satisfaction Questionnaire of Patient's Hospitalized in Intensive Care Units.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2024Article
- Awareness and Management of Knee Pain and Osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness Among Jordanian Medical Students: Using Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale For Medical Students (MAIRS-MS).Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFostering a culture of clinical effectiveness among healthcare professionals (HCPs) is crucial to achieving optimal patient health outcomes. To our knowledge, there is a lack of robust evidence-based practice (EBP) tools to assess the competence of HCPs in EBP in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR).
aimThis study aims to comprehensively investigate the construct validity and internal reliability of the evidence-based practice questionnaire (EBPQ) among HCPs in the EMR.
methodsThis multinational and multi-disciplinary cross-sectional study was conducted between 27 April and 11 May 2023. Convenience and snowball sampling methods were used to recruit a sample of HCPs (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, dentists, and pharmacists) using an electronic survey questionnaire for data capture. To assess the reliability of the instrument, Cronbach's alpha, inter-item reliability, and split-half reliability analyses were conducted. Furthermore, the convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire was ensured by calculating the average variance extracted (AVE) and the correlation coefficient between the different constructs, respectively. Factor loadings and cross-loadings of different indicators within each construct were calculated by performing both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
resultsA total of 1536 HCPs from 18 countries in the EMR (response rate = 96.786%) with a median age of 28 years participated; 47% were female, and 55% had Arabic as their first language. English was the most common language for a bachelor's degree in science (54%). The construct validity of the EBPQ was investigated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), which yielded four loaded factors. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the four loaded factors. The CFA model showed that the root mean square error of approximation = 0.066, comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker-Lewis's index = 0.94, standardized root mean square residual = 0.033, normal fit index = 0.94, goodness of fit = 0.91, and χ
conclusionsThe EBPQ is a robust questionnaire that can be completed in less than 10 min by EMR HCPs and can be used as a gold-standard questionnaire to collect valid data on the attitudes, knowledge, and proficiency of HCPs in making clinical decisions based on evidence. Future studies are recommended to investigate the retest reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.