ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Can We Predict Prostate Cancer Metastasis Based on Biomarkers? Where Are We Now?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting disease progression and mortality in prostate cancer using real-world data-driven time-inhomogeneous Markov models.iScience · 2026Article
- Impact of radiotherapy timing on survival and radiotoxicity outcomes in localized prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Deep Transfer Learning Links Benign Glands to Prostate Cancer Progression via Transcriptomics.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Optimized graph neural network-multilayer perceptron fusion classifier for metastatic prostate cancer detection in Western and Asian populations.Asian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Raman micro-spectroscopy reveals the metabolic alterations in primary prostate tumor tissues of patients with metastases.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Bone Marrow Failure in Prostate Cancer: A Rare Case Initially Disguised as Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.Cureus · 2025Article
- Signet-ring cell carcinoma in rectal malignancies: a case report with an unexpected outcome.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer theragnostics biomarkers: An update.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Review
- Review
- Incidence of exclusive extrapelvic skeletal metastasis in prostate carcinoma on bone scintigraphy.World journal of radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of prostate cancer (PC) has risen annually. PC mortality is explained by the metastatic disease (mPC). There is an intermediate scenario in which patients have non-mPC but have initiated a metastatic cascade through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. There is indeed a need for more and better tools to predict which patients will progress in the future to non-localized clinical disease or already have micrometastatic disease and, therefore, will clinically progress after primary treatment. Biomarkers for the prediction of mPC are still under development; there are few studies and not much evidence of their usefulness. This review is focused on tissue-based genomic biomarkers (TBGB) for the prediction of metastatic disease. We develop four main research questions that we attempt to answer according to the current evidence. Why is it important to predict metastatic disease? Which tests are available to predict metastatic disease? What impact should there be on clinical guidelines and clinical practice in predicting metastatic disease? What are the current prostate cancer treatments? The importance of predicting metastasis is fundamental given that, once metastasis is diagnosed, quality of life (QoL) and survival drop dramatically. There is still a need and space for more cost-effective TBGB tests that predict mPC disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.