Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569883›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Can We Predict Prostate Cancer Metastasis Based on Biomarkers? Where Are We Now?

Ignacio F San Francisco, Pablo A Rojas, Juan C Bravo, Jorge Díaz, Luis Ebel, Sebastián Urrutia, Benjamín Prieto, Javier Cerda-Infante

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prostate cancer theragnostics biomarkers: An update.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ignacio F San FranciscoEnviron Innovation Laboratory, Avenida Providencia 1208 Oficina 207, Providencia, Santiago 7500000, Chile.
Pablo A RojasServicio de Urología, Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sotero del Río, Santiago 8150215, Chile.
Juan C BravoServicio de Urología, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins, Rancagua 2820000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-8581-7658
Jorge DíazServicio de Urología, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago 7500921, Chile.
Luis EbelServicio de Urología, Hospital Base de Valdivia, Universidad Austral, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Sebastián UrrutiaServicio de Urología, Hospital Dr. Hernán Henríquez Aravena, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.
Benjamín PrietoEnviron Innovation Laboratory, Avenida Providencia 1208 Oficina 207, Providencia, Santiago 7500000, Chile.
Javier Cerda-InfanteEnviron Innovation Laboratory, Avenida Providencia 1208 Oficina 207, Providencia, Santiago 7500000, Chile.

Funding

Production Development Corporation 201IAT 130292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of prostate cancer (PC) has risen annually. PC mortality is explained by the metastatic disease (mPC). There is an intermediate scenario in which patients have non-mPC but have initiated a metastatic cascade through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. There is indeed a need for more and better tools to predict which patients will progress in the future to non-localized clinical disease or already have micrometastatic disease and, therefore, will clinically progress after primary treatment. Biomarkers for the prediction of mPC are still under development; there are few studies and not much evidence of their usefulness. This review is focused on tissue-based genomic biomarkers (TBGB) for the prediction of metastatic disease. We develop four main research questions that we attempt to answer according to the current evidence. Why is it important to predict metastatic disease? Which tests are available to predict metastatic disease? What impact should there be on clinical guidelines and clinical practice in predicting metastatic disease? What are the current prostate cancer treatments? The importance of predicting metastasis is fundamental given that, once metastasis is diagnosed, quality of life (QoL) and survival drop dramatically. There is still a need and space for more cost-effective TBGB tests that predict mPC disease.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisQuality of LifeBiomarkersmetastasisprostate cancertissue-based genomic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37569883
PMCPMC10420177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.