Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569864›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Bladder Epicheck Test: A Novel Tool to Support Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis in Urine Samples.

Vincenzo Fiorentino, Cristina Pizzimenti, Mariausilia Franchina, Esther Diana Rossi, Pietro Tralongo, Angela Carlino, Luigi Maria Larocca, Maurizio Martini, Guido Fadda, Francesco Pierconti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of Bladder EpiCheckJournal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. UrinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of CombinedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenzo FiorentinoDepartment of Human Pathology of the Adult and Developmental Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-1761
Cristina PizzimentiPhD Programme in Translational Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-7174
Mariausilia FranchinaDepartment of Human Pathology of the Adult and Developmental Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Esther Diana RossiDepartment of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Pietro TralongoDepartment of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Angela CarlinoDepartment of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Luigi Maria LaroccaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (UniCamillus), 00131 Rome, Italy.
Maurizio MartiniDepartment of Human Pathology of the Adult and Developmental Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-6310
Guido FaddaDepartment of Human Pathology of the Adult and Developmental Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Francesco PiercontiDepartment of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy.
University of Messina · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer and upper urothelial tract carcinoma are common diseases with a high risk of recurrence, thus necessitating follow-up after initial treatment. The management of non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) after transurethral resection involves surveillance, intravesical therapy, and cytology with cystoscopy. Urinary cytology, cystoscopy, and radiological evaluation of the upper urinary tract are recommended during follow-up in the international urological guidelines. Cystoscopy is the standard examination for the first assessment and follow-up of NMIBC, and urine cytology is a widely used urinary test with high sensitivity for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS). In recent years, various urinary assays, including DNA methylation markers, have been used to detect bladder tumors. Among these, the Bladder EpiCheck test is one of the most widely used and is based on analysis of the methylation profile of urothelial cells to detect bladder neoplasms. This review assesses the importance of methylation analysis and the Bladder EpiCheck test as urinary biomarkers for diagnosing urothelial carcinomas in patients in follow-up for NMIBC, helping cytology and cystoscopy in doubtful cases. A combined approach of cytology and methylation analysis is suggested not only to diagnose HGUC, but also to predict clinical and histological recurrences.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystoscopyEpithelial CellsHumansUrinary BladderUrinebladder carcinomamethylationtumoral recurrenceurinary biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37569864
PMCPMC10420163
OpenAlexW4385614954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.