Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569603›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Microbial Consortia for Plant Protection against Diseases: More than the Sum of Its Parts.

Tomasz Maciag, Edmund Kozieł, Piotr Rusin, Katarzyna Otulak-Kozieł, Sylwia Jafra, Robert Czajkowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
24.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Formulations of synergistic microbial consortia for enhanced systemic resistance against Fusarium wilt in cumin.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genomic and phenotypic analyses revealFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz MaciagDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska Street 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-5944
Edmund KoziełDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska Street 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6646-1254
Piotr RusinDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska Street 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Otulak-KoziełDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska Street 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9424-1662
Sylwia JafraDivision of Biological Plant Protection, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology UG and MUG, University of Gdansk, Antoniego Abrahama Street 58, 80-307 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-6180
Robert CzajkowskiLaboratory of Biologically Active Compounds, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology UG and MUG, University of Gdansk, Antoniego Abrahama Street 58, 80-307 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9641-5603
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PLUniversity of Gdańsk · PL

Funding

Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki, Polska) DS 531-N104-D800-23Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki, Polska) DS 532-N105-D786-23Polish National Science Center, NCN 2021/43/D/NZ3/00428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological plant protection presents a promising and exciting alternative to chemical methods for safeguarding plants against the increasing threats posed by plant diseases. This approach revolves around the utilization of biological control agents (BCAs) to suppress the activity of significant plant pathogens. Microbial BCAs have the potential to effectively manage crop disease development by interacting with pathogens or plant hosts, thereby increasing their resistance. However, the current efficacy of biological methods remains unsatisfactory, creating new research opportunities for sustainable plant cultivation management. In this context, microbial consortia, comprising multiple microorganisms with diverse mechanisms of action, hold promise in terms of augmenting the magnitude and stability of the overall antipathogen effect. Despite scientific efforts to identify or construct microbial consortia that can aid in safeguarding vital crops, only a limited number of microbial consortia-based biocontrol formulations are currently available. Therefore, this article aims to present a complex analysis of the microbial consortia-based biocontrol status and explore potential future directions for biological plant protection research with new technological advancements.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalMicrobial ConsortiaBiological Control AgentsPlant DiseasesBiological Control Agentsbiocontrolbiocontrol agentsbiopesticidescrop protectionplant diseases

Identifiers

PMID37569603
PMCPMC10418420
OpenAlexW4385421674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.