Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569295›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Opportunities and Challenges of In Vitro Tissue Culture Systems in the Era of Crop Genome Editing.

Zelalem Eshetu Bekalu, Michael Panting, Inger Bæksted Holme, Henrik Brinch-Pedersen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biodiversity and genetic improvement ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. OptimizingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zelalem Eshetu BekaluDepartment of Agroecology, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark.
Michael PantingDepartment of Agroecology, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-3090
Inger Bæksted HolmeDepartment of Agroecology, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-0086
Henrik Brinch-PedersenDepartment of Agroecology, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-8903
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

Innovation Fund Denmark 8055-00038B, ReTraQue project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the development of genome editing (GE) tools has provided a wide platform for targeted modification of plant genomes. However, the lack of versatile DNA delivery systems for a large variety of crop species has been the main bottleneck for improving crops with beneficial traits. Currently, the generation of plants with heritable mutations induced by GE tools mostly goes through tissue culture. Unfortunately, current tissue culture systems restrict successful results to only a limited number of plant species and genotypes. In order to release the full potential of the GE tools, procedures need to be species and genotype independent. This review provides an in-depth summary and insights into the various in vitro tissue culture systems used for GE in the economically important crops barley, wheat, rice, sorghum, soybean, maize, potatoes, cassava, and millet and uncovers new opportunities and challenges of already-established tissue culture platforms for GE in the crops.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGene EditingCRISPR-Cas SystemsEdible GrainGenome, PlantGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPlants, Genetically Modifiedcropsgenetic transformationgenome editingnew breeding technologiestissue culturetrait improvement

Identifiers

PMID37569295
PMCPMC10419073
OpenAlexW4385278723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.