ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Recent Advances in the Determination of Milk Adulterants and Contaminants by Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection and Quantification of Corn Starch and Wheat Flour as Adulterants in Milk Powder by Raman Spectroscopy Coupled with Chemometric Routines.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improved FTIR-based classification for food authentication using a topological ensemble framework.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Chemometric Tools Associated with Quality Parameters for Evaluation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Electroanalytical Approaches to Combatting Food Adulteration: Advances in Non-Enzymatic Techniques for Ensuring Quality and Authenticity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A critical review of conventional and emerging technologies for the detection of contaminants, allergens and adulterants in plant-based milk alternatives.Current research in food science · 2025Review
- Vibrational spectroscopy data fusion for enhanced classification of different milk types.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Chromatographic Analysis of Emerging Pollutants in Dairy Milk: A Review (2018-2023).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Rapid detection of micronutrient components in infant formula milk powder using near-infrared spectroscopy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of chemical contaminants, toxins, or veterinary drugs in milk, as well as the adulteration of milk from different species, has driven the development of new tools to ensure safety and quality. Several analytical procedures have been proposed for the rapid screening of hazardous substances or the selective confirmation of the authenticity of milk. Mid-infrared spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared have been two of the most relevant technologies conventionally employed in the dairy industry. These fingerprint methodologies can be very powerful in determining the trait of raw material without knowing the identity of each constituent, and several aspects suggest their potential as a screening method to detect adulteration. This paper reviews the latest advances in applying mid-infrared spectroscopy for the detection and quantification of adulterants, milk dilution, the presence of pathogenic bacteria, veterinary drugs, and hazardous substances in milk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.