ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Plant Proteins: Methods of Quality Assessment and the Human Health Benefits of Pulses.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of thermal processing on protein quality and bioactivity of tilapia: Explored byFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Factors associated with vegetarian orientation among Seoul citizens: focusing on food literacy and sociodemographic characteristics.Nutrition research and practice · 2026Article
- Effect of Different Microwave Times on the Nutritional Properties of Glycosylated Soybean 7S.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Changes in texture, flavor, and protein digestion of low-salt chickpea surimi composite gel: Based on Kanto cooking model and peptidomics.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Protein Source, Dietary Fibre Intake, and Inflammation in Older Adults: A UK Biobank Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Unveiling the nutritional spectrum: A comprehensive analysis of protein quality and antinutritional factors in three varieties of quinoa (Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Protein Nutrition: Understanding Structure, Digestibility, and Bioavailability for Optimal Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Legumes and Cereals: Physicochemical Characterization, Technical Innovation and Nutritional Challenges.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As countries increase their standard of living and individual income levels rise, there is a concomitant increase in the demand for animal-based protein. However, there are alternative sources. One of the alternatives available is that of increased direct human consumption of plant proteins. The quality of a dietary protein is an important consideration when discussing the merits of one protein source over another. The three most commonly used methods to express protein quality are the protein efficiency ratio (PER), a weight gain measurement; protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS); and the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). The possibility that alterations in the quality and quantity of protein in the diet could generate specific health outcomes is one being actively researched. Plant-based proteins may have additional beneficial properties for human health when compared to animal protein sources, including reductions in risk factors for cardiovascular disease and contributions to increased satiety. In this paper, the methods for the determination of protein quality and the potential beneficial qualities of plant proteins to human health will be described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.