Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569048›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Efficacy and Effectiveness of Universal School-Based Wellbeing Interventions in Australia: A Systematic Review.

Harshi Gunawardena, Alexander Voukelatos, Sham Nair, Shane Cross, Ian B Hickie

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Digital media balance and mental health: effects of a school-based program.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Autistic young people's psychological well-being in school.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harshi GunawardenaBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Alexander VoukelatosSydney Local Health District, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Sham NairCurriculum and Reform Directorate, NSW Department of Education, Sydney 2001, Australia.
Shane CrossOrygen, Parkville 3052, Australia.
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUNSW Department of Education · AUOrygen · AUSydney Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organisation defines health in terms of wellbeing, and wellbeing has become both a construct and a measure of impact in early intervention and prevention programs in schools. In Australia, schools report on their wellbeing initiatives and there is a plethora of government-funded wellbeing programs already in place in schools. However, education systems and stakeholders worldwide are facing significant challenges with mixed evaluation results of program impact and intervention effect. To better support students, schools, school-based healthcare workers, and community, it is important to know about the effectiveness of school-based programs; yet in the last decade, there has been no national appraisal of these programs in Australia. This systematic review aims to report on the effectiveness of Australian school-based wellbeing programs through a search of 13 databases. Out of 2888 articles, 29 met inclusion criteria. The results found that seventeen interventions comprising 80% of the total number of participants reported no statistically significant intervention effect on wellbeing outcomes. We argue that supporting wellbeing through robust program intervention is important as wellbeing presents both an indication of later onset of more serious mental health issues, and an opportunity for early intervention to break the trajectory leading to full disorder.

Indexed as

SchoolsStudentsAustraliaEarly Intervention, EducationalHumansProgram Evaluationearly interventioneffectivenessmental healthschoolwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37569048
PMCPMC10418788
OpenAlexW4385490976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.