Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569019›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Allied Health Professions Accreditation Standards for Work Integrated Learning: A Document Analysis.

Merrolee Penman, Jacqueline Raymond, Annora Kumar, Renae Y R Liang, Karen Sundar, Yvonne Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merrolee PenmanCurtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-2052
Jacqueline RaymondSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Annora KumarMedical School, Health and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Renae Y R LiangSchool of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia.
Karen SundarCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
Yvonne ThomasSchool of Occupational Therapy, Otago Polytechnic, Te Pūkenga, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key role of allied health (AH) professional regulatory and professional bodies is to ensure that AH education programs provide work-integrated learning (WIL) opportunities for students. The requirements are outlined via the respective profession's educational accreditation standards. Although a significant component of the AH professional degrees, researchers have not explored how standards specific to WIL are developed, nor how WIL might be conceptualised through the standards. This study explored how WIL is conceptualised through comparing the WIL education standards across Australian AH professions. Using a non-experimental explanatory mixed-methods research design, a document analysis of Australian education program accreditation standards (and associated documents) for 15 AH professions was undertaken. Data analysis included inductive textual and thematic analyses to compare AH professionals' conceptualisation of WIL. This study found a high degree of variation in how AH professions describe WIL. While there was a common requirement for students to demonstrate competency in WIL, requirements for WIL quantity, assessment and supervision varied. Four key themes were identified regarding the contribution of WIL to curriculum and student learning: (1) the relationship between WIL and the program curriculum; (2) WIL as a learning process; (3) learning from diverse WIL contexts; and (4) developing competence through WIL. Overall, the diversity in the standards reflected differing understandings of what WIL is. Thus, in the absence of frameworks for designing accreditation standards, the risk is that some AH professions will continue to perpetuate the myth that the primary purpose of WIL is to provide a bridge between theory and practice.

Indexed as

CurriculumDocument AnalysisAccreditationAustraliaHealth OccupationsHumansaccreditation standardsallied healthclinical placementshealth professions educationwork integrated learning

Identifiers

PMID37569019
PMCPMC10418477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.