ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
[
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- NonsteroidalJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Prostate Cancer Imaging Beyond PSMA: Applications of GRPR, AR, and Amino Acid Tracers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Two Decades of Disease Evolution and Biomarker-Guided Clinical Decision Making in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Tracing prostate cancer - the evolution of PET-CT applications.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024Review
- PSMA PET/CT in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Myth or Reality?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Molecular Imaging of Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone ([
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.