ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A CT-Based Clinical, Radiological and Radiomic Machine Learning Model for Predicting Malignancy of Solid Renal Tumors (UroCCR-75).
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in the radiologic diagnosis of major urological cancers: a meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in detection of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Tumor Heterogeneity of RCCs Assessed by mpMRI with Direct Radiological-Histopathological Correlation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CT-Based Radiomics in the Characterization of Solid Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Emerging Role of ctDNA Fragmentomics and Epigenetic Signatures in the Early Detection, Minimal Residual Disease Assessment, and Precision Monitoring of Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- A predictive model for WHO/ISUP pathologic grading of renal clear cell carcinoma based on CT radiomics: a multicenter study.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- CECT-Based Radiomic Nomogram of Different Machine Learning Models for Differentiating Malignant and Benign Solid-Containing Renal Masses.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Convolutional neural networks for the differentiation between benign and malignant renal tumors with a multicenter international computed tomography dataset.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Differentiation of Small Clear Renal Cell Carcinoma and Oncocytoma through Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics Analysis: Toward the End of Percutaneous Biopsy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating benign from malignant renal tumors is important for patient management, and it may be improved by quantitative CT features analysis including radiomic. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare performances of machine learning models using bio-clinical, conventional radiologic and 3D-radiomic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant solid renal tumors using pre-operative multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT examinations. MATERIALS AND
methodsA unicentric retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from a national kidney cancer database was conducted between January 2016 and December 2020. Histologic findings were obtained by robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. Lesion images were semi-automatically segmented, allowing for a 3D-radiomic features extraction in the nephrographic phase. Conventional radiologic parameters such as shape, content and enhancement were combined in the analysis. Biological and clinical features were obtained from the national database. Eight machine learning (ML) models were trained and validated using a ten-fold cross-validation. Predictive performances were evaluated comparing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC.
resultsA total of 122 patients with 132 renal lesions, including 111 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (111/132, 84%) and 21 benign tumors (21/132, 16%), were evaluated (58 +/- 14 years, men 74%). Unilaterality (100/111, 90% vs. 13/21, 62%;
conclusionOur machine learning-based model combining clinical, radiologic and radiomics features from multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT scans may help differentiate benign from malignant solid renal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.