Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568799›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Clinical Relevance of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience from Korea.

Kyung-Jin Eoh, Tae-Kyung Lee, Eun-Ji Nam, Sang-Wun Kim, Young-Tae Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyung-Jin EohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yongin Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1684-2267
Tae-Kyung LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Ji NamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Wun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-8701
Young-Tae KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-1052
Yonsei University · KRInha University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRed blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a standard parameter of complete blood count and indicates the variability in red blood cell size. This study aimed to determine whether preoperative RDW can be used to predict the recurrence and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.

methodsThe medical records of 431 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed between May 2006 and June 2018. In addition to RDW, the clinicopathological factors, survival curves, and prognoses of the patients with endometrial carcinoma were compared between the high (

resultsThe patients with high RDW had significantly advanced-stage (

conclusionOur results demonstrate that RDW is a simple and convenient indicator of endometrial carcinoma recurrence. Prospective studies are needed to validate the findings of the current study.

Indexed as

endometrial neoplasmsmortalityred blood cell distribution

Identifiers

PMID37568799
PMCPMC10417026
OpenAlexW4385602870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.