Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568750›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Population-Based Clinical Cancer Registration in Germany.

Alexander Katalinic, Marco Halber, Martin Meyer, Maren Pflüger, Andrea Eberle, Alice Nennecke, Soo-Zin Kim-Wanner, Tobias Hartz, Kerstin Weitmann, Andreas Stang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. REPCAN: Guideline for REporting Population-based CANcer Registry Data.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alexander KatalinicCancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0490-1554
Marco HalberCancer Registry Baden-Wurttemberg, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany.
Martin MeyerBavarian Cancer Registry, 90441 Nurnberg, Germany.
Maren PflügerCancer Registry Brandenburg-Berlin, 03048 Cottbus, Germany.
Andrea EberleCancer Registry Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Alice NenneckeHamburg Cancer Registry, 20097 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7115-5160
Soo-Zin Kim-WannerHessian Cancer Registry, 60439 Frankfurt, Germany.
Tobias HartzCancer Registry Lower Saxony, 30659 Hannover, Germany.
Kerstin WeitmannCancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Andreas StangCancer Registry North Rhine-Westphalia, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-9061
Christina JustenhovenCancer Registry Rhineland-Palatinate, 55116 Mainz, Germany.
Bernd HolleczekSaarland Cancer Registry, 66119 Saarbrucken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8759-4371
Daniela PiontekJoint Office of the Clinical Cancer Registries in Saxony, 01099 Dresden, Germany.
Ian WittenbergCancer Registry Saxony-Anhalt, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Annika HeßmerCancer Registry Thuringia, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Klaus KraywinkelCentre for Cancer Registry Data at the Robert Koch-Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany.
Claudia SpixDivision of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
Ron PritzkuleitCancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-2941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2013, a new federal law obligated all German federal states to collect additional clinical data in population-based cancer registries as an active tool for monitoring and improving the quality of cancer care, increasing transparency and promoting health research. Now, 10 years later, the current status of the expanded cancer registration is presented, including current figures on cancer in Germany.

methodsReporting of cancer is mandatory for physicians, and about 5 to 10 reports from different healthcare providers are expected for each case. A uniform national dataset of about 130 items is used, and reports are usually sent electronically to the registry. We used the most recent data available from cancer registries up to the year of diagnosis in 2019. We calculated incidence rates and 5-year relative survival (5YRS) for common cancers. Data on clinical outcomes and benchmarking based on quality indicators (QIs) from guidelines were provided by the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein (CR SH).

resultsAll federal state cancer registries met most of the previously defined national eligibility criteria. Approximately 505,000 cancer cases were registered in 2019, with breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer being the most common cancers. The age-standardised cancer incidence has slightly decreased during the last decade. and spatial heterogeneity can be observed within Germany. 5YRS for all cancers was 67% and 63% for women and men, respectively. Therapy data for rectal cancer in 2019-2021 from the CR SH are shown as an example: 69% of the registered patients underwent surgery, mostly with curative intent (84%) and tumour-free resection (91%). Radiotherapy was given to 33% of the patients, and chemotherapy was given to 40%. Three selected QIs showed differences between involved healthcare providers. DISCUSSION: The implementation of population-based clinical cancer registration can be considered a success. Comprehensive recording of diagnosis, treatment and disease progression and the use of registry data for quality assurance, benchmarking and feedback have been implemented.

Indexed as

benchmarkingcancercancer registrationGermanyincidencequality assurance

Identifiers

PMID37568750
PMCPMC10416989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.