Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568717›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Clinical Applications of Immunotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma in Adults.

Meagan Mandabach Olivet, Michael C Brown, Zachary J Reitman, David M Ashley, Gerald A Grant, Yuanfan Yang, James M Markert

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meagan Mandabach OlivetHeersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Michael C BrownDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Zachary J ReitmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-9550
David M AshleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Gerald A GrantDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Yuanfan YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1581-451X
James M MarkertDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7457-7329
Duke University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Oncolytic Immunotherapy using Chimeric HSV C134: A Phase I Trial and Establishment of Response Indicators in Recurrent Glioma PatientsR01CA222903 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CASSADY, KEVIN A, MARKERT, JAMES M · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
Enhancing the efficacy of Radiation Therapy for brainstem glioma by targeting ATMK08CA256045 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Zachary Reitman · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA256045NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite standard therapies, including resection and chemoradiation, recurrence is virtually inevitable. Current treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is rapidly evolving, and emerging therapies aimed at targeting primary GBM are often first tested in rGBM to demonstrate safety and feasibility, which, in recent years, has primarily been in the form of immunotherapy. The purpose of this review is to highlight progress in clinical trials of immunotherapy for rGBM, including immune checkpoint blockade, oncolytic virotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, cancer vaccine and immunotoxins. Three independent reviewers covered literature, published between the years 2000 and 2022, in various online databases. In general, the efficacy of immunotherapy in rGBM remains uncertain, and is limited to subsets/small cohorts of patients, despite demonstrating feasibility in early-stage clinical trials. However, considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms that may preclude rGBM patients from responding to immunotherapy, as well as in developing new approaches/combination strategies that may inspire optimism for the utility of immunotherapy in this devastating disease. Continued trials are necessary to further assess the best therapeutic avenues and ascertain which treatments might benefit each patient individually.

Indexed as

CAR T cellcheckpoint inhibitorimmunotherapyimmunotoxinsoncolytic virusrecurrent glioblastomarGBMvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37568717
PMCPMC10416859
OpenAlexW4385428909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.