ArticleCancers2023
A Deep Learning Onion Peeling Approach to Measure Oral Epithelium Layer Number.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Cell Segmentation With Globally Optimized Boundaries (CSGO): A Deep Learning Pipeline for Whole-Cell Segmentation in Hematoxylin-and-Eosin-Stained Tissues.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2025Article
- A transformation uncertainty and multi-scale contrastive learning-based semi-supervised segmentation method for oral cavity-derived cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), specifically in the oral cavity (oral squamous cell carcinoma, OSCC), is a common, complex cancer that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Early diagnosis typically improves prognoses yet relies on pathologist examination of histology images that exhibit high inter- and intra-observer variation. The advent of deep learning has automated this analysis, notably with object segmentation. However, techniques for automated oral dysplasia diagnosis have been limited to shape or cell stain information, without addressing the diagnostic potential in counting the number of cell layers in the oral epithelium. Our study attempts to address this gap by combining the existing U-Net and HD-Staining architectures for segmenting the oral epithelium and introducing a novel algorithm that we call Onion Peeling for counting the epithelium layer number. Experimental results show a close correlation between our algorithmic and expert manual layer counts, demonstrating the feasibility of automated layer counting. We also show the clinical relevance of oral epithelial layer number to grading oral dysplasia severity through survival analysis. Overall, our study shows that automated counting of oral epithelium layers can represent a potential addition to the digital pathology toolbox. Model generalizability and accuracy could be improved further with a larger training dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.