ReviewCancers2023
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro expansion for regenerative applications: tracking small genetic variants reveals dynamic changes within a genetically stable framework.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- EndoscopicWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world regorafenib use among patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the United States.PloS one · 2026Article
- Review
- Somatic mutational profiling and clinical impact of driver genes in Latin-Iberian medulloblastomas: Towards precision medicine.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2025Article
- Natural Alkaloids in Cancer Therapy: Berberine, Sanguinarine and Chelerythrine against Colorectal and Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adjuvant imatinib improves the recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who have a high risk of recurrence after surgery and is now considered standard treatment. Yet, OS benefit has been demonstrated in only one randomized study, the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO trial, where patients with high-risk GISTs were allocated to either 1 year or 3 years of adjuvant imatinib. SSGXVIII/AIO is also the only randomized trial in which adjuvant imatinib duration exceeding 2 years was evaluated. In this trial, the 3-year treatment led to a 45% reduction in the risk of death during the first 10 years that followed random allocation even though some of the patients did not have GISTs at tumor histology review, had mutations now known to be imatinib-resistant or had non-localized disease at study entry. In the subgroup of patients who had
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.