Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568671›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

The Evolving Landscape of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Hana Studentova, Martina Spisarova, Andrea Kopova, Anezka Zemankova, Bohuslav Melichar, Vladimir Student

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hana StudentovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-9258
Martina SpisarovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Andrea KopovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Anezka ZemankovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Bohuslav MelicharDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Vladimir StudentDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-1871

Funding

Czech Science Foundation SPP 911103671/31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been studied intensively over the past few decades. Interestingly, the opinion with regard to the importance of this procedure has switched from a recommendation as a standard of care to an almost complete refutation. However, no definitive agreement on cytoreductive nephrectomy, including the pros and cons of the procedure, has been reached, and the topic remains highly controversial. With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, we have experienced a paradigm shift, with immunotherapy playing a crucial role in the treatment algorithm. Nevertheless, obtaining results from prospective clinical trials on the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy requires time, and once some data have been gathered, the standards of systemic therapy may be different, and we stand again at the beginning. This review summarizes current knowledge on the topic in the light of newly evolving treatment strategies. The crucial point is to recognize who could be an appropriate candidate for immediate cytoreductive surgery that may facilitate the effect of systemic therapy through tumor debulking, or who might benefit from deferred cytoreduction in the setting of an objective response of the tumor. The role of prognostic factors in management decisions as well as the technical details associated with performing the procedure from a urological perspective are discussed. Ongoing clinical trials that may bring new evidence for transforming therapeutic paradigms are listed.

Indexed as

cytoreductive nephrectomydeferred nephrectomyimmunotherapyrenal carcinomatyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37568671
PMCPMC10417043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.