Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568663›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Which Patients Do We Need to Test for BRCA1/2 Mutation? Feasibility of Adjuvant Olaparib Treatment in Early Breast Cancer-Real-World Data from Two Large German Breast Centers.

Dominik Dannehl, Tobias Engler, Léa Louise Volmer, Christian Martin Tegeler, Julia Fusshoeller, Emma Gabrysch, Kenneth Eissler, Anna Seller, Eva-Maria Grischke, Markus Hahn and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Therapy of early breast cancer: current status and perspectives.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik DannehlDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7653-8283
Tobias EnglerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-2053
Léa Louise VolmerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Christian Martin TegelerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6688-7351
Julia FusshoellerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Emma GabryschDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Kenneth EisslerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Anna SellerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Eva-Maria GrischkeDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Markus HahnDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Ines GruberDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Fabienne SchochterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-6494
Kerstin PfisterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Kristina VeselinovicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Elena LeinertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Brigitte RackDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Visnja FinkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Sara Yvonne BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-1542
Andreas Daniel HartkopfDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1227-1118
Henning SchäfflerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 6% of women with breast cancer carry pathogenic germline variants in predisposition genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2. Depending on personal and family cancer history, it is therefore recommended to test for hereditary breast cancer. Moreover, as shown by the phase III OlympiA trial, olaparib significantly improves overall survival in patients with HER2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who (1) carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation (gBRCA1/2-positive), (2) have received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and (3) are at high clinical risk. The objective of the current analysis was to determine the number of patients with early HER2- breast cancer who are at high clinical risk, according to the inclusion criteria of OlympiA, and to estimate how many of these patients would meet the criteria for hereditary cancer testing in a real-world analysis.

methodsAll patients included in this retrospective analysis were treated for early breast cancer (eBC) at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Germany, and the Department of Women's Health at Tuebingen University Hospital, Germany, between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were identified as high risk, in line with the clinicopathological determiners used in the OlympiA trial. The criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer were used to identify patients who qualify for hereditary cancer testing.

resultsOf 2384 eligible patients, 1738 patients (72.9%) showed a hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- tumor biology, 345 patients (14.5%) displayed HER2+ breast cancer and 301 patients (12.6%) suffered from HR-/HER2- breast cancer (TNBC). Of 2039 HER2- breast cancer patients, 271 patients (13.3%) were at high clinical risk. This cohort encompassed 130 of the 1738 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (7.5%) and 141 of 301 patients with TNBC (46.8%). A total of 121 of 271 patients (44.6%) with high clinical risk met the criteria for hereditary cancer testing (34 of 130 (26.2%) HR+/HER2- patients and 87 of 141 (61.7%) patients with TNBC).

conclusionApproximately one in ten patients with HR+/HER2-, and half of the patients with TNBC, meet the high-risk criteria according to OlympiA. Half of these patients do not meet the criteria for hereditary cancer testing and should therefore be tested for the presence of gBRCA1/2 mutations, irrespective of their own or family cancer history. The overall number of patients with early breast cancer benefiting from olaparib needs to be investigated in future studies.

Indexed as

BRCAbreast cancerolaparib

Identifiers

PMID37568663
PMCPMC10417328
OpenAlexW4385422022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.