Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568581›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

SMAD4 Positive Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas Are Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients Receiving FOLFIRINOX-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Marie-Lucie Racu, Dana Bernardi, Aniss Chaouche, Egor Zindy, Julie Navez, Patrizia Loi, Calliope Maris, Jean Closset, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Christine Decaestecker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marie-Lucie RacuDepartement of Pathology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Dana BernardiDepartement of Pathology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Aniss ChaoucheDepartement of Pathology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Egor ZindyDigital Image Analysis in Pathology (DIAPath), Center for Microscopy and Molecular Imaging (CMMI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 6041 Gosselies, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0033-0002
Julie NavezDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-8764
Patrizia LoiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Calliope MarisDepartement of Pathology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean ClossetDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Luc Van LaethemDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Christine DecaesteckerDigital Image Analysis in Pathology (DIAPath), Center for Microscopy and Molecular Imaging (CMMI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 6041 Gosselies, Belgium.
Isabelle SalmonDepartement of Pathology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7732-2863
Nicky D'HaeneDepartement of Pathology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Erasme NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSMAD4 is inactivated in 50-55% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). SMAD4 loss of expression has been described as a negative prognostic factor in PDAC associated with an increased rate of metastasis and resistance to therapy. However, the impact of SMAD4 inactivation in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is not well characterized. The aim of our study was to investigate whether SMAD4 status is a prognostic and predictive factor in patients receiving NAT.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 59 patients from a single center who underwent surgical resection for primary PDAC after NAT. SMAD4 nuclear expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and its relationship to clinicopathologic variables and survival parameters was evaluated. Interaction testing was performed between SMAD4 status and the type of NAT.

results49.15% of patients presented loss of SMAD4. SMAD4 loss was associated with a higher positive lymph node ratio (

conclusionThis study highlights the potential prognostic and predictive role of SMAD4 status in PDAC patients receiving FOLFIRINOX-based NAT.

Indexed as

biomarkermetastasis-free survivalneoadjuvant therapyoverall survivalpancreaspancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprognosisprogression-free survivalSMAD4

Identifiers

PMID37568581
PMCPMC10417261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.