Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568573›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Treatment Response Assessment in Osteoblastic Metastases-A Repeatability Study.

Maria Eveslage, Philipp Rassek, Arne Riegel, Ziad Maksoud, Jochen Bauer, Dennis Görlich, Benjamin Noto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria EveslageInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8802-1134
Philipp RassekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Arne RiegelClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Ziad MaksoudClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-4640
Jochen BauerClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-2126
Dennis GörlichInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2574-9419
Benjamin NotoInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-3709
University Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a candidate marker of treatment response in osteoblastic metastases that are not evaluable by morphologic imaging. However, it is unclear whether the ADC meets the basic requirement for reliable treatment response evaluation, namely a low variance of repeated measurements in relation to the differences found between viable and nonviable metastases. The present study addresses this question by analyzing repeated in vivo ADC

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientbone metastasesdiffusion-weighted imagingprostate cancerquantitative imagingrepeatabilitytest–retest study

Identifiers

PMID37568573
PMCPMC10417276
OpenAlexW4385321254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.