ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Unraveling the Links between Chronic Inflammation, Autoimmunity, and Spontaneous Cervicocranial Arterial Dissection.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The perfect storm: autoinflammation, metabolic stress, and thrombolysis in bilateral carotid dissection-a case report.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Association Between Autoimmune Thyroiditis and Cervical Artery Dissection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Malignant Otitis Externa Presenting With Nasopharyngeal Hematoma: A Case Report of an Unusual Complication.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Endothelial senescence of the vertebral artery in the context of cervical degeneration: biomechanically driven remodeling of the hemodynamic environment.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Biological Sex and Outcomes in Patients with Extracranial Cervical Arterial Dissections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of Attenuation in Pericarotid Fat among Patients with Carotid Plaque and Spontaneous Carotid Dissection.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with an increased risk of cervical artery dissection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peripheral inflammatory response in people after acute ischaemic stroke and isolated spontaneous cervical artery dissection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of ischemic stroke in cervical artery dissection.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in imaging techniques have led to a rise in the diagnosis of spontaneous cervicocranial arterial dissection (SCCAD), which is now considered a common cause of stroke in young adults. However, our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying SCCAD remains limited. Prior studies have proposed various factors contributing to arterial wall weakness or stress as potential causes for SCCAD. A combination of biopsies, case reports, and case-control studies suggests that inflammatory changes and autoimmunity may play roles in the cascade of events leading to SCCAD. In this review, we examine the close relationship between SCCAD, chronic inflammation, and autoimmune diseases, aiming to explore potential underlying pathophysiological mechanisms connecting these conditions. While some relevant hypotheses and studies exist, direct evidence on this topic is still relatively scarce. Further investigation of the underlying mechanisms in larger clinical cohorts is needed, and the exploration of animal models may provide novel insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.