Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568481›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Urgent Implantation of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter in Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury-A Review.

Hanna Cholerzyńska, Wiktoria Zasada, Hanna Michalak, Miłosz Miedziaszczyk, Andrzej Oko, Ilona Idasiak-Piechocka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna CholerzyńskaDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-783X
Wiktoria ZasadaDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9329-3495
Hanna MichalakDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Miłosz MiedziaszczykDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-1461
Andrzej OkoDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Ilona Idasiak-PiechockaDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and sudden exacerbation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently necessitate urgent kidney replacement therapy (UKRT). Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is recognized as a viable modality for managing such patients. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) may be associated with an increased number of complications and is rarely utilized. This review examines recent literature investigating the clinical outcomes of USPD in CKD and AKI. Relevant research was identified through searches of the MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases using MeSH terms and relevant keywords. Included studies focused on the emergency use of peritoneal dialysis in CKD or AKI and reported treatment outcomes. While no official recommendations exist for catheter implantation in USPD, the impact of the technique itself on outcomes was found to be less significant compared with the post-implantation factors. USPD represents a safe and effective treatment modality for AKI, although complications such as catheter malfunctions, leakage, and peritonitis were observed. Furthermore, USPD demonstrated efficacy in managing CKD, although it was associated with a higher incidence of complications compared to conventional-start peritoneal dialysis. Despite its cost-effectiveness, PD requires greater technical expertise from medical professionals. Close supervision and pre-planning for catheter insertion are essential for CKD patients. Whenever feasible, an urgent start should be avoided. Nevertheless, in emergency scenarios, USPD does remain a safe and efficient approach.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurychronic kidney diseaseperitoneal dialysisurgent-start peritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID37568481
PMCPMC10419992
OpenAlexW4385483360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.