Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568473›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Measuring Quality of Life in Adults with Scoliosis: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing SRS-22 and ISYQOL Questionnaires.

Fabio Zaina, Irene Ferrario, Antonio Caronni, Stefano Scarano, Sabrina Donzelli, Stefano Negrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Are pain intensity measures interchangeable? agreement among ODI, SRS-22, and COMI in chronic low back pain with and without scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Patient-Reported Mental Health and Quality of Life in Pediatric Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabio ZainaISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Via Roberto Bellarmino 13/1, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-5362
Irene FerrarioISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Via Roberto Bellarmino 13/1, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-9103
Antonio CaronniIRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Ospedale San Luca, 20149 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3051-1031
Stefano ScaranoIRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Ospedale San Luca, 20149 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-4117
Sabrina DonzelliISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Via Roberto Bellarmino 13/1, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6637-7797
Stefano NegriniDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University "La Statale", 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1878-2747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic scoliosis is common in adulthood and can impact patients' physical and psychological health. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22) has been designed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in idiopathic scoliosis, and it is the most used disease-specific outcome tool from adolescence to adulthood. More recently, the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) international questionnaire was developed, which performs better than SRS-22 in adolescent spinal deformities. However, the ISYQOL questionnaire has never been tested in adults. This study compares the construct validity of ISYQOL and SRS-22 with the Rasch analysis (partial credit model). We recruited 150 adults and 50 adolescents with scoliosis (≥30° Cobb). SRS-22, but not ISQYOL, showed disordered categories and one item not fitting the Rasch model. A 21-item SRS-22 version with revised categories was arranged and further compared to ISYQOL. Both questionnaires showed multidimensionality, and some items (SRS-22 in a greater number) functioned differently in persons of different ages. However, the artefacts caused by multidimensionality and differential functioning had a low impact on the questionnaires' measures. The construct validity of ISYQOL International and the revised SRS-22 are comparable. Both questionnaires (but not the original SRS-22) can return measures of disease burden in adults with scoliosis.

Indexed as

adult scoliosispsychometricsquality of liferasch analysis

Identifiers

PMID37568473
PMCPMC10419552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.