Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568356›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Myomectomy of FIGO Type 3 Myoma: A Systematic Review.

Andrea Etrusco, Antonio Simone Laganà, Vito Chiantera, Amerigo Vitagliano, Ettore Cicinelli, Mislav Mikuš, Marina Šprem Goldštajn, Federico Ferrari, Stefano Uccella, Simone Garzon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea EtruscoUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7414-4224
Antonio Simone LaganàUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1543-2802
Vito ChianteraUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Amerigo Vitagliano1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical and Human Oncological Science (DIMO), University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Ettore Cicinelli1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical and Human Oncological Science (DIMO), University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-4582
Mislav MikušClinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-1365-8704
Marina Šprem GoldštajnClinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1747-204X
Federico FerrariDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25136 Brescia, Italy.
Stefano UccellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4456-0822
Simone GarzonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5840-699X
Sandro GerliSection of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-3062
Alessandro FavilliSection of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-0962
University of Palermo · ITUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Verona · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest classification from the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) has reclassified type 3 myomas, changing their classification from intramural to submucosal. While hysteroscopic myomectomy is considered the gold standard treatment for patients experiencing symptoms from submucosal myomas, there are currently no specific guidelines available for managing type 3 myomas, and the optimal surgical approach remains uncertain.

Indexed as

female infertilityhysteroscopymyoma type 3myomectomyuterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID37568356
PMCPMC10419844
OpenAlexW4385348906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.