ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07222514 (Feasibility and Safety of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility and Safety of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Evaluation
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Innovation in reconstructive plastic surgery.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Global research trends and thematic evolution in robot-assisted breast reconstructive surgery: a bibliometric and visualisation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Breast Reconstruction After Cancer: Historical Development, Modern Techniques, and Psychological Impact.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Bridging Oncological Safety and Aesthetic Excellence in the Era of Precision Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Comparison of Robotic-assisted and Conventional Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Exploring the Use of Robotics in Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Perspective.Cureus · 2025Review
- Present and Future of Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Advancing Techniques to Minimize Morbidity and Complications, Enhancing Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Optimizing flap surgery: the need for standardized surgical delay techniques and patient-specific approaches.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the United States: a narrative review of the current state.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- Bridging the Gap: Exploring Opportunities, Challenges, and Problems in Integrating Assistive Technologies, Robotics, and Automated Machines into theHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibility studies or technical descriptions; few cohort analyses exist. This systematic review aims to characterize trends in robotic autologous breast reconstruction and provide a summative analysis of their results. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate robot use in breast reconstruction. Studies dated from 2006 to 2022 were identified and analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text, peer-reviewed, English-language, and human subject studies were included. Non-breast reconstruction articles, commentary, expert opinion, editor's letter, and duplicate studies were excluded. A total of 17 full-text articles were analyzed. The two robotic breast procedures identified were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Results showed comparable complication rates and increased operative times compared to NSQIP data on their corresponding open techniques. Additional findings reported in studies included patient reported outcomes, incision lengths, and downward trends in operative time with consecutive procedures. The available data in the literature confirms that robotic surgery is a promising alternative to traditional open methods of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.