Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568352›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Clinical and Procedural Outcomes of IVUS-Guided vs. Angiography-Guided CTO-PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Giuseppe Panuccio, Youssef S Abdelwahed, Nicole Carabetta, Nadia Salerno, David Manuel Leistner, Ulf Landmesser, Salvatore De Rosa, Daniele Torella, Gerald S Werner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Guidewire Manipulation Based on Establishment of Stereo Perception in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe PanuccioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Youssef S AbdelwahedDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2708-4596
Nicole CarabettaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Nadia SalernoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
David Manuel LeistnerDepartment of Medicine, Cardiology, Goethe University Hospital, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
Salvatore De RosaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-942X
Daniele TorellaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-5084
Gerald S WernerMedizinische Klinik I Klinikum Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6011-0135
Magna Graecia University · ITDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Darmstadt · DE

Funding

Grants from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (PNRR-National Center for Gene Therapy and Drugs based on RNA Technology" CN00000041), and from the Italian Ministry of Health (PSC SALUTE 2014-2020 -POS4 "Cal-Hub-Ria"-T4-AN-09 and PNRR-MAD-2022 Grants from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (PNRR-National Center for Gene Therapy and Drugs based on RNA Technology" CN00000041), and from the Italian Ministry of Health (PSC SALUTE 2014-2020 -POS4 "Cal-Hub-Ria"-T4-AN-09 and PNRR-MAD-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) in coronary angiographies present a significant challenge nowadays. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a valuable tool during CTO-PCI, aiding in planning and achieving procedural success. However, the impact of IVUS on clinical and procedural outcomes in CTO-PCI remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare IVUS-guided and angiography-guided approaches in CTO-PCI. The study included five studies and 2320 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and CTO. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) did not significantly differ between the groups (

Indexed as

chronic total occlusionscomplex PCIintravascular imagingintravascular ultrasoundIVUS

Identifiers

PMID37568352
PMCPMC10419599
OpenAlexW4385346239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.