Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568258›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Preliminary feasibility and effectiveness of a novel community language intervention for preschool children in the United Kingdom.

Nicola Botting, Helen Spicer-Cain, Bernadine Buckley, Elizabeth Mercado, Khadija Sharif, Liz Wood, Jane Flynn, Louisa Reeves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicola BottingSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-9501
Helen Spicer-CainSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
Bernadine BuckleySchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
Elizabeth MercadoSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
Khadija SharifSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
Liz WoodSpeech and Language UK (formerly ICAN charity), UK.
Jane FlynnSpeech and Language UK (formerly ICAN charity), UK.
Louisa ReevesSpeech and Language UK (formerly ICAN charity), UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVery young children from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds often show poorer language development. Whilst there have been attempts to provide early intervention programmes, these sometimes miss the most disadvantaged groups.

aimsThis report presents preliminary feasibility and effectiveness data for a novel language intervention designed for parents of toddlers in the United Kingdom. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In total, 43 UK families of 2-4-year-olds were recruited to the study, half of whom completed an 8-week course (Tots Talking) focussed on parent interaction, and half of whom acted as wait-list controls. RESULTS AND OUTCOMES: Results suggest that such programmes are feasible for families with 86% staying in the intervention. In addition, greater changes in underlying communication skills such as joint attention and gesture were evident compared to wait-list controls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We conclude that pre-verbal skills may be more important to measure as initial outcomes than language or vocabulary change in this population. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Children from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds are at higher risk of communication difficulties and there is a need for community intervention programmes for very young children. What this study adds This study suggests that such programmes can be feasible and effective, but that very early/basic communicative skills (such as joint attention) may be boosted first rather than language or vocabulary. What are the clinical implications of this work? Children's centres and other community services could feasibly run short parent facing courses emphasising contingent communication in low SES families and other diverse groups. These may be more successful run with younger preschoolers. Joint attention may be a better focus of intervention before expecting vocabulary or language change. Community health professionals may find this information useful in referring and supporting families in need.

Indexed as

CommunicationLanguageChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHumansParentsVocabularyInterventionjoint attentionparentspre-school

Identifiers

PMID37568258
PMCPMC13504690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.