Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568240›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2023

Evaluation of the liquid colony for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures.

Calvo Maddalena, Migliorisi Giuseppe, Marianna Perez, Scalia Guido, Stefani Stefania

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid AST in practice - a workflow analysis of the QuickMICFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Performance of next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of blood infections byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Calvo MaddalenaU.O.C. Laboratory Analysis Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, Catania, 95123, Italy.
Migliorisi GiuseppeU.O.C. Laboratory Analysis Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, Catania, 95123, Italy.
Marianna PerezClinical Microbiology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Policlinico Hospital, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97 Third floor, Est tower, Catania, 95124, Italy.
Scalia GuidoU.O.C. Laboratory Analysis Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, Catania, 95123, Italy.
Stefani StefaniaU.O.C. Laboratory Analysis Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, Catania, 95123, Italy. stefania.stefani@unict.it.
University of Catania · ITPoliclinico Universitario di Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis represents a time-sensitive disease requiring early therapeutical intervention to avoid adverse patient outcomes. Rapid microbiological diagnosis is essential to investigate sepsis aetiological agents. The FAST™ system (Qvella, ON, Canada) provides a concentrated microbial suspension, known as a Liquid Colony™ (LC), directly from positive blood samples (PBCs) in 30-40 min to perform rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).

methodsQvella's FAST™ System and FAST PBC Prep cartridges were tested on PBCs from the Policlinico Hospital of Catania during a six-month study. Two millilitres of PBC were converted into an LC for rapid ID and AST using Bruker Biotyper Sirius MALDI and BD Phoenix systems. Standard of care (SOC) methods were used as a reference, requiring 48-72 h. Agreement between the innovative technology and the standard method was calculated.

resultsFAST System processing was performed on 100 monomicrobial PBCs. Median turnaround times from blood cultures flagging positive to ID and AST completion were 2 and 26 h respectively. Therefore, the LC procedure was 24 h faster than the median turnaround times for SOC methods. 100% ID identification concordance was observed across 48 Gram-negative bacteria, 42 Gram-positive bacteria and 11 yeast for the genus level. 78% of Gram-negative and 95% of Gram-positive bacteria were resistant to ≥ 2 antimicrobial agents, including 45% (15/33) carbapenem-resistant enteric Gram-negative bacteria and 90% (28/31) oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. An AST essential agreement of 100% was observed due to the absence of MIC discrepancies > 1-fold dilution. Categorical errors were not observed due to the absence of MIC categorization discordances. Yeast AST was not performed.

conclusionsThe Qvella FAST System produces an LC that reliably reflects the MALDI spectra and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility profile of microbial cells growing in the blood culture. Timely processing of PBCs with the Qvella FAST System enables sepsis diagnostic confirmation 1 day sooner than the standard methods. In line with these results, it is vital now to focus attention on establishing best practices for incorporating this strategic tool into the clinical microbiology laboratory workflow.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteremiaSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBlood CultureGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsLiquid colonyPurified microbial suspensionsepsisTime-saving workflow

Identifiers

PMID37568240
PMCPMC10422792
OpenAlexW4385761217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.