Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568228›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Rotational ThromboElastometry-guided blood component administration versus standard of care in patients with Cirrhosis and coagulopathy undergoing Invasive ProcEdures (RECIPE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Natasha Janko, Ammar Majeed, William Kemp, Chris Hogan, Harshal Nandurkar, Stuart K Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha JankoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. n.janko@alfred.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5693-0248
Ammar MajeedDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
William KempDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chris HoganDepartment of Laboratory Haematology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Harshal NandurkarDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stuart K RobertsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alfred Health · AUAustin Health · AUAustralian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research · AUMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AU

Funding

National Blood Authority ID 403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cirrhosis often undergo invasive procedures both for management of complications of their advanced liver disease, including treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as underlying comorbidities. Despite a current understanding that most patients with cirrhosis are in a rebalanced haemostatic state (despite abnormalities in conventional coagulation tests, namely INR and platelet count), patients with cirrhosis are still often given prophylactic blood components based on these conventional parameters, in an effort to reduce procedure-related bleeding. Viscoelastic tests such as Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) provide a global measurement of haemostasis and have been shown to predict bleeding risk more accurately than conventional coagulation tests, and better guide blood product transfusion in a number of surgical and trauma-related settings. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of a ROTEM-based algorithm to guide prophylactic blood component delivery in patients with cirrhosis undergoing invasive procedures. We hypothesise that ROTEM-based decision-making will lead to a reduction in pre-procedural blood component usage, particularly fresh frozen plasma (FFP), compared with standard of care, whilst maintaining optimal clinical outcomes.

methodsThis is a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing ROTEM-guided prophylactic blood component administration to standard of care in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy undergoing invasive procedures. The primary efficacy outcome of the trial is the proportion of procedures requiring prophylactic transfusion, with the primary safety outcome being procedure-related bleeding complications. Secondary outcomes include the amount of blood products (FFP, platelets, cryoprecipitate) transfused, transfusion-related side effects, procedure-related complications other than bleeding, hospital length of stay and survival. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that this project will lead to improved prognostication of patients with cirrhosis, in terms of their peri-procedural bleeding risk. We hope to show that a significant proportion of cirrhotic patients, deemed coagulopathic on the basis of standard coagulation tests such as INR and platelet count, are actually in a haemostatic balance and thus do not require prophylactic blood product, leading to decreased and more efficient blood component use.

trial registrationRECIPE has been prospectively registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on the 30th April 2019 ( ACTRN12619000644167 ).

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersHemostaticsHemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStandard of CareThrombelastographyHemostaticsChronic liver diseaseCirrhosisCoagulopathyFresh frozen plasmaPlateletsRotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM)SurgeryTransfusionViscoelastic tests (VETs)

Identifiers

PMID37568228
PMCPMC10422802
OpenAlexW4385761484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.