Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568212›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Potential cognitive and neural benefits of a computerised cognitive training programme based on Structure Learning in healthy adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Chia-Lun Liu, Xiaoqin Cheng, Boon Linn Choo, Min Hong, Jia Li Teo, Wei Ler Koo, Jia Yuan Janet Tan, Marisha Barth Ubrani, John Suckling, Balázs Gulyás and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611788 (Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611788 nacompletednot on this map

Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled108ConditionsHealthyArmsStructure Learning Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Chia-Lun LiuCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. chia-lun.liu@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-8958
Xiaoqin ChengCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Linn ChooCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Min HongCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Jia Li TeoCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Ler KooCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Jia Yuan Janet TanCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Marisha Barth UbraniCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
John SucklingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Balázs GulyásLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Victoria LeongCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Barbara SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Trevor RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Annabel Shen-Hsing ChenCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Nanyang Technological University · SGUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P021255/1Wellcome Trust 205067/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive flexibility refers to the capacity to shift between conceptual representations particularly in response to changes in instruction and feedback. It enables individuals to swiftly adapt to changes in their environment and has significant implications for learning. The present study focuses on investigating changes in cognitive flexibility following an intervention programme-Structure Learning training.

methodsParticipants are pseudo-randomised to either the Training or Control group, while matched on age, sex, intelligence and cognitive flexibility performance. In the Training group, participants undergo around 2 weeks of training (at least 13 sessions) on Structure Learning. In the Control group, participants do not have to undergo any training and are never exposed to the Structure Learning task. The effects of Structure Learning training are investigated at both the behavioural and neural level. We measured covariates that can influence an individual's training performance before the training phase and outcome measures that can potentially show training benefits after the training phase. At the behavioural level, we investigated outcomes in both cognitive and social aspects with a primary focus on executive functions. At the neural level, we employed a multimodality approach and investigated potential changes to functional connectivity patterns, neurometabolite concentration in the frontal brain regions, and brain microstructure and myelination. DISCUSSION: We reported the development of a novel training programme based on Structure Learning that aims to hone a general learning ability to potentially achieve extensive transfer benefits across various cognitive constructs. Potential transfer benefits can be exhibited through better performance in outcome measures between Training and Control participants, and positive associations between training performance and outcomes after the training in Training participants. Moreover, we attempt to substantiate behavioural findings with evidence of neural changes across different imaging modalities by the Structure Learning training.

trial registrationNational Institutes of Health U.S. National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05611788. Registered on 7 November 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: 11 May 2023.

Indexed as

Cognitive TrainingLearningAdultBrainCognitionExecutive FunctionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitive flexibilityExploitationExplorationInterventionMagnetic resonance imagingNeuropsychological model of cognitive flexibilityStatistical learningStructure learning

Identifiers

PMID37568212
PMCPMC10422731
OpenAlexW4385761116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.