Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568206›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of Rural School Support Strategies for behavioral interventions: a mixed methods evaluation over two years of a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial.

Hannah G Calvert, Michaela McQuilkin, Ashley Havlicak, Teri Lewis, Lindsey Turner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03736395 (Scaling up Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03736395 nacompletednot on this map

Scaling up Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) Framework in Rural Settings Through the Idaho Rural Implementation Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoise State UniversityRan2019 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsProblem BehaviorArmsIdaho Rural Implementation Model, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah G CalvertCenter for School and Community Partnerships, College of Education, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1742, USA. hannahcalvert898@boisestate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6067-693X
Michaela McQuilkinCenter for School and Community Partnerships, College of Education, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1742, USA.
Ashley HavlicakSchool of Public and Population Health, College of Health Sciences, Boise State University, 1910 W University Dr, Boise, ID, 83725-1742, USA.
Teri LewisCenter for School and Community Partnerships, College of Education, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1742, USA.
Lindsey TurnerCenter for School and Community Partnerships, College of Education, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1742, USA.
Boise State University · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Justice 2017-CK-BX-0021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a framework for implementing evidence-based interventions for preventing behavioral issues and improving climate in schools. The implementation of school-wide PBIS with fidelity is complex, requiring leadership commitment, teaming, and coordination of systems for tracking behaviors and consequences. Putting these components in place while ensuring alignment with the values and needs of the school community can be difficult for schools with fewer resources, such as rural schools. Implementation supports are needed, including strategies such as technical assistance, but it is unclear whether lower-cost modalities such as virtual support are acceptable, appropriate, and feasible and whether perceptions vary throughout the implementation process.

methodsA type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial is taking place in 40 Idaho schools, testing a bundle of implementation supports selected to meet the needs of schools in rural areas. Supports include technical assistance from an implementation support practitioner (ISP), didactic trainings, virtual learning sessions, and an online resource portal. Surveys and interviews in the first 2 years of implementation (fall 2019 to spring 2021) explored outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility regarding the implementation supports among more than 150 school stakeholders.

resultsEvaluations showed high acceptability and appropriateness of the PBIS concepts and training. The 20 schools receiving additional implementation support rated the technical assistance and support from the project's ISPs as the most acceptable and appropriate resource. Reasons for acceptability were the relationship built with the ISP, the ISP's expertise, and being a "neutral party." Although in-person support from the ISP was preferred, remote support was acceptable and increased feasibility of attendance. Virtual learning sessions were acceptable for learning and collaboration, particularly in the second year of implementation, once ISPs had developed closer relationships with school teams.

conclusionsSchool staff found training, technical assistance, and virtual learning sessions to be acceptable and appropriate. Virtual formats of training and technical assistance decreased in acceptability but increased feasibility of attendance. In-person support was preferred during initial implementation, and virtual support was more acceptable thereafter.

trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03736395 ), on November 9, 2018.

Indexed as

Behavioral interventionChildren’s healthImplementation outcomesSchool climateTechnical assistanceVirtual learning collaborative

Identifiers

PMID37568206
PMCPMC10416374
OpenAlexW4385764144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.