Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568180›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Neurocognition and mean radiotherapy dose to vulnerable brain structures: new organs at risk?

Helena Söderström, Angelica Walfridsson, Ulla Martinsson, Ulf Isacsson, Karin Brocki, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Gustaf Ljungman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helena SöderströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. helena.soderstrom@kbh.uu.se.
Angelica WalfridssonDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulla MartinssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulf IsacssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin BrockiDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan Lundin KlebergDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustaf LjungmanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund PR2018-0042Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund TJ2018-0046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with brain tumors are at high risk of neurocognitive decline after radiotherapy (RT). However, there is a lack of studies on how RT doses to organs at risk (OARs) impacts neurocognition. The aim of this study was to examine dose-risk relationships for mean RT dose to different brain structures important for neurocognitive networks. We explored previously established OARs and potentially new OARs.

methodsA sample of 44 pediatric brain tumor survivors who had received proton and/or photon RT were included. Correlations between mean RT doses to OARs and IQ were analyzed. Previously established OARs were cochleae, optic chiasm, optic nerve, pituitary gland, hypothalamus, hippocampus and pons. Potential new OARs for RT-induced neurocognitive decline were cerebellum, vermis and thalamus.

resultsMean RT dose to different OARs correlated with several IQ subtests. Higher mean RT dose to cochleae, optic nerve, cerebellum, vermis and pons was correlated with lower performance on particularly full-scale IQ (FIQ), Perceptual Reasoning (PRI), Working Memory (WMI) and Processing Speed Index (PSI). Higher mean RT dose to hippocampus correlated with lower performance on processing speed and working memory. For those receiving whole brain RT (WBRT), higher mean RT dose to the pituitary gland correlated with lower performance on working memory.

conclusionA high dose-risk correlation was found between IQ subtests and mean RT dose in established and potential new OARs. Thus, in the lack of validated dose constraints for vulnerable brain structures, a parsimonious approach in RT planning should be considered to preserve neurocognitive networks.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedBrainChildHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedNeurocognitionOrgans at riskPediatric brain tumorRadiotherapy doses

Identifiers

PMID37568180
PMCPMC10416465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.