Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568088›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

The willingness and barriers to collaborate in the care of frail older adults: perspectives of primary care professionals.

Leen De Coninck, Anja Declercq, Leen Bouckaert, Carola Döpp, Maud J L Graff, Bert Aertgeerts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leen De ConinckDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. leen.deconinck@kuleuven.be.
Anja DeclercqLUCAS Center for Care Research and Consultancy & CESO Center for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, Leuven, 5310, Belgium.
Leen BouckaertDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Voetweg 66, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Carola DöppScientific Institute for Quality of Health Care, Department of Rehabilitation, Radboudumc Research Institute, Radboud University Medical Center, Houtlaan 4, Nijmegen, 6525 XZ, the Netherlands.
Maud J L GraffScientific Institute for Quality of Health Care, Department of Rehabilitation, Radboudumc Research Institute, Radboud University Medical Center, Houtlaan 4, Nijmegen, 6525 XZ, the Netherlands.
Bert AertgeertsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. bert.aertgeerts@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the perspectives of primary care professionals, in particular general practitioners, registered nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists, on inter-professional collaboration, the barriers and the facilitators they perceive in the care of the frail older population.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study. In-depth interviews with healthcare professionals were performed, using open-ended questions about their perceptions on the care of frail older adults and inter-professional collaboration. Data was analyzed following the Basic Logical Model of Abduction and Creswell's coding method.

resultsHealthcare professionals indicated that when they explored problems complementary to the reasons for older people to contact a healthcare professional, these additional problems often seemed to be the main problem. They also stated that there was too little inter-professional collaboration in the care of complex chronic issues and lack of a shared vision on collaboration. Collaboration is still limited too much to contacting established professions. Health information technology can support both, inter-professional collaboration and working on an evidence-based manner. It can also be a facilitator to inform patients. The availability and use of health information technology differs between the professions. Success factors and barriers for sustainable collaboration were identified on several levels, namely innovation, individual, professional, patient, social context, context of the organization, economic and political context.

conclusionsOur study shed light on the willingness and barriers in collaboration of healthcare professionals in primary care for older adults. There is little inter-professional collaboration, despite the willingness of the healthcare professionals to collaborate.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyPhysical TherapistsAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchBarriersFrailtyInter-professional collaborationPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37568088
PMCPMC10422814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.