Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37568085›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2023

The difference in rotation angle of the distal endotracheal tube through nasal approach.

Masanori Tsukamoto, Maho Goto, Takashi Hitosugi, Takeshi Yokoyama

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masanori TsukamotoDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. tsukamoto@dent.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.
Maho GotoDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takashi HitosugiDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takeshi YokoyamaDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPKagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNasal intubation using a fiberoptic scope is a useful technique. In clinical practice, we have experienced difficulty in advancing the endotracheal tube (ETT) over the fiberoptic scope because of resistance to the passage of the ETT against rotation in the nasal cavity, when it gets hung up on structures of the laryngeal inlet. Several maneuvers have been proposed to overcome this difficulty. The gap between the tip of the ETT and the fiberoptic scope can be reduced using a thicker fiberoptic scope and a thinner ETT. Moreover, simultaneous rotation of the fiberoptic scope and ETT could lead to successful intubation by reducing impingement on the ETT. However, the discrepancy between these rotation angles is unclear. This observational prospective study aimed to investigate the discrepancy in the rotation angle between the ETT and fiberoptic scope during nasal intubation.

methodsThe patients (aged 20-80 years) who underwent nasal intubation for oral and maxillofacial surgery participated in three sizes of preformed nasal ETT and were intubated using a fiberoptic scope. They were divided into three groups; the ETT internal diameter (ID) 6.5 mm (6.5 group), ID 7.0 mm (7.0 group), and ID 7.5 mm (7.5 group). The ETT was then inserted through the nasal cavity into the pharynx. After the fiberoptic scope was advanced through the ETT above the glottis, simultaneous rotation by both the proximal end of the fiberoptic scope and ETT was performed in 90° and 180° in both right (clockwise) and left (counterclockwise) directions, and the rotation angle at the distal end of the ETT was monitored using a video laryngoscope (Pentax-AWS).

resultsA total of 39 patients were included in the study. When both the proximal end of the fiberscope and ETT were simultaneously rotated by 90°, in the 6.5 group (n = 13), the distal end of the ETT rotated by 47.8 ± 1.5°. In the 7.0 °group (n = 13), the distal end of the ETT rotated by 45.5 ± 1.0°. In the 7.5 group (n = 13), the distal end of the ETT rotated by 39.9 ± 1.0°. When the proximal end of the fiberscope and ETT were rotated by 180°, in the 6.5 group, the distal end of the ETT rotated by 166.2 ± 2.5°. In the 7.0 group, the distal end of the ETT rotated by 145.7 ± 2.2°. In the 7.5 group, the distal end of the ETT rotated by 115.1 ± 2.0°. All rotation angles in the distal end of the ETT were significantly lower than those in both the proximal end of the fiberscope and ETT (p < 0.05). Rotating right by 180° was significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.05), although rotating right by 90° was not significantly different. Similar results were obtained for the left rotation.

conclusionSimultaneous rotation by the proximal end of the ETT and fiberscope above the glottis for the nasal approach induced significant differences in the distal end of the ETT. The larger tube lagged by the resistance of the nasal passages during rotation. Therefore, the ETT does not rotate as much as the rotation angle.

trial registrationThis prospective observational study was conducted after receiving approval from the Ethics Review Board of Kyushu University Hospital (Approval No. 30-447).

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealLarynxAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMiddle AgedNasal CavityProspective StudiesRotationYoung AdultFiberscopeNasotracheal intubationRotation

Identifiers

PMID37568085
PMCPMC10416368
OpenAlexW4385765333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.