ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
Hysteroscopy in the new media: quality and reliability analysis of hysteroscopy procedures on YouTube™.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Effective Dose 90 (ED90) and Clinical Outcomes of Fentanyl Versus Esketamine for Analgesia in Hysteroscopy: A Two-Part, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Dose-Finding of Alfentanil for Hysteroscopy Under Remimazolam Sedation in Obese and Normal-Weight Patients: An Up-and-Down Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Prospective Dose-Finding of Esketamine for Suppressing Cervical Dilation Response in Ambulatory Hysteroscopy Under Monitored Anesthesia Care.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Tetanus Health Information on YouTube and TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Quality, Reliability, and Public Health Implications.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study on the quality and reliability of short videos related to precancerous cervical lesions on major platforms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impacts of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Misinformation in Digital Spaces on Human Rights Protection and Promotion: Scoping Review.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Hidden misinformation in YouTube short videos on syphilis: A mixed-methods study.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision and Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The Reliability and Quality of Videos as Guidance for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- TikTok as a platform for hysteroscopy information: An analytical video-based cross-sectional study to assess quality, reliability, and accuracy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Efficacy of the silicone rubber uterine stent in the prevention of adhesion after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Endometrial ablation as a safe treatment for adenomyosis-related abnormal uterine bleeding in women with cerebral infarction: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Bilibili and TikTok as sources of medical information on osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A cross-platform content analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysteroscopy plays a crucial role in diagnosing and managing various intrauterine pathologies. However, its execution can be influenced by patients' perception and understanding, which are often shaped by digital resources such as YouTube PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the reliability and quality of hysteroscopy information available to patients on YouTube
methodsA comprehensive analysis of YouTube
resultsThe average mDISCERN and GQS scores for the evaluated videos were below the optimal three points, highlighting the lack of fluency, comprehensiveness, and reliability of the available information. Notably, while videos produced by experts, including doctors and professional channels, had higher scores, they still fell short of the minimum score of 3. These videos also were not considered more suitable for either patients or trainees. Videos that were assessed as reliable (mDISCERN ≥ 3) were observed to be longer and were more frequently produced by doctors. These videos were suggested more to trainees rather than patients. Similarly, videos deemed as fluent and comprehensive (GQS ≥ 3) were longer and were more often recommended to patients.
conclusionsWhile YouTube
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.