Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37567931›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2023

An inexpensive semi-automated sample processing pipeline for cell-free RNA extraction.

Mira N Moufarrej, Stephen R Quake

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mira N MoufarrejDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8953-4057
Stephen R QuakeDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. steve@quake-lab.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1613-0809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in automated liquid handling and microfluidics, preparing samples for RNA sequencing at scale generally requires expensive equipment, which is beyond the reach of many academic laboratories. Manual sample preparation remains a slow, expensive and error-prone process. Here, we describe a low-cost, semi-automated pipeline to extract cell-free RNA using one of two commercially available, inexpensive and open-source robotic systems: the Opentrons OT1.0 or OT2.0. Like many RNA isolation protocols, ours can be decomposed into three subparts: RNA extraction, DNA digestion and RNA cleaning and concentration. RT-qPCR data using a synthetic spike-in confirms comparable RNA quality to the gold standard, manual sample processing. The semi-automated pipeline also shows improvement in sample throughput (+12×), time spent (-11×), cost (-3×) and biohazardous waste produced (-4×) compared with its manual counterpart. This protocol enables cell-free RNA extraction from 96 samples simultaneously in 4.5 h; in practice, this dramatically improves the time to results, as we recently demonstrated. Importantly, any laboratory already has most of the parts required (manual pipette and corresponding tips and kits for RNA isolation, cleaning and concentration) to build a semi-automated sample processing pipeline of their own and would only need to purchase or three-dimensionally print a few extra parts (US$5.5 K-12 K in total). This pipeline is also generalizable for many nucleic acid extraction applications, thereby increasing the scale of studies, which can be performed in small research laboratories.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNARNASpecimen HandlingCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNARNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.