Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37567745›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Diagnostic reliability in teledermatology: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Adrienn N Bourkas, Natasha Barone, Matthew E C Bourkas, Matthew Mannarino, Robert D J Fraser, Amy Lorincz, Sheila C Wang, Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Patient-Centered Teledermatology: Bridging Pharmacies and Dermatologists.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Review on Teledermatology in Saudi Arabia: Framework, Barriers, and Opportunities.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrienn N Bourkas *Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0664-8161
Natasha Barone *Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew E C BourkasDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew MannarinoDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Qubec, Canada.
Robert D J FraserNursing, Western University Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, London, Ontario, Canada.
Amy LorinczIndependent Researcher, Montreal, Qubec, Canada.
Sheila C WangSwift Medical, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLunaDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Qubec, Canada ramirezgl@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3953-9762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare teledermatology and face-to-face (F2F) agreement in primary diagnoses of dermatological conditions.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL and medRxiv were searched between January 2010 and May 2022. Observational studies and randomised clinical trials that reported percentage agreement or kappa concordance for primary diagnoses between teledermatology and F2F physicians were included. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened in duplicate. From 7173 citations, 44 articles were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled estimates. Primary outcome measures were mean percentage and kappa concordance for assessing diagnostic matches between teledermatology and F2F physicians. Secondary outcome measures included the agreement between teledermatologists, F2F dermatologists, and teledermatology and histopathology results.

results44 studies were extracted and reviewed. The pooled agreement rate was 68.9%, and kappa concordance was 0.67. When dermatologists conducted F2F and teledermatology consults, the overall diagnostic agreement was significantly higher at 71% compared with 44% for non-specialists. Kappa concordance was 0.69 for teledermatologist versus specialist and 0.52 for non-specialists. Higher diagnostic agreements were also noted with image acquisition training and digital photography. The agreement rate was 76.4% between teledermatologists, 82.4% between F2F physicians and 55.7% between teledermatology and histopathology. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Teledermatology can be an attractive option particularly in resource-poor settings. Future efforts should be placed on incorporating image acquisition training and access to high-quality imaging technologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FJDVG.

Indexed as

DermatologyPhysiciansSkin DiseasesTelemedicineHumansReferral and ConsultationReproducibility of ResultsDERMATOLOGYInformation technologyPRIMARY CARESTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODSTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37567745
PMCPMC10423833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.