Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37567605›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2023

Cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure and atrial fibrillation: a propensity- matched study.

Munyra Alhotye, Rachael Evans, Andre Ng, Sally J Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Munyra AlhotyeDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK ma880@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-9382
Rachael EvansDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Andre NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-0671
Sally J SinghDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common in individuals with heart failure (HF). Individuals with HF and AF may have a reduced functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) which leads to hospital admission and burden on clinical services. Evidence supported the effect of exercise training in individuals with HF. However, there is no existing data on the effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in individuals with coexisting HF and AF.

aimTo explore the effect of CR in individuals with HF and AF compared with those with HF and no-coexisting AF.

methodsUsing CR database, individuals with HF and AF were identified and propensity matched to those with no coexisting AF. The change in incremental shuttle walking test, Heart Disease Quality of Life questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores were compared between groups pre-CR and post-CR.

results149 individuals were propensity matched from each group. The mean±SD age of the matched sample was 73.4±8 years, body mass index 29±5.5 kg/m

conclusionsIndividuals with HF and AF gain a similar improvement in exercise capacity and health related QoL outcomes as individuals with no coexisting AF following CR. The presence of AF did not compromise the effectiveness of CR.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiac RehabilitationHeart FailureAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAtrial FibrillationCARDIAC REHABILITATIONHEART FAILURE

Identifiers

PMID37567605
PMCPMC10423825
OpenAlexW4385766278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.