Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37567386›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2023

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pleural Mesothelioma Staging Project: Updated Modeling of Prognostic Factors in Pleural Mesothelioma.

Andrea S Wolf, Adam Rosenthal, Dorothy J Giroux, Anna K Nowak, Andrea Bille, Marc de Perrot, Hedy L Kindler, David Rice, Isabelle Opitz, Valerie W Rusch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrea S WolfDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: andrea.wolf@mountsinai.org.
Adam RosenthalCancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Dorothy J GirouxCancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Anna K NowakMedical School of the University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Andrea BilleDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Marc de PerrotDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Hedy L KindlerSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
David RiceDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Isabelle OpitzDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Harvey I PassDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Members of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee
Advisory Board, and Participating Institutions

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed an international pleural mesothelioma database to improve staging. Data entered from 1995 to 2009 (training data set) were analyzed previously to evaluate supplemental prognostic factors. We evaluated these factors with new clinical data to determine whether the previous models could be improved.

methodsPatients entered into the database from 2009 to 2019 (validation cohort) were assessed for the association between previous prognosticators and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression with bidirectional stepwise selection. Additional variables were analyzed and models were compared using Harrell's C-index.

resultsThe training data set included 3101 patients and the validation cohort, 1733 patients. For the multivariable pathologic staging model applied to the training cohort, C-index was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.656-0.705). For the validation data set (n = 497), C-index was 0.650 (95% CI: 0.614-0.685), and pathologic stage, histologic diagnosis, sex, adjuvant therapy, and platelet count were independently associated with survival. Adding anemia to the model increased the C-index to 0.652 (95% CI: 0.618-0.686). A basic presentation model including all parameters before staging yielded a C-index of 0.668 (95% CI: 0.641-0.695). In comparison, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer model yielded C-indices of 0.550 (95% CI: 0.511-0.589) and 0.577 (95% CI: 0.550-0.604) for pathologic staging and presentation models, respectively.

conclusionsAlthough significant predictors differed slightly, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer training model performed well in the validation set and better than the model of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. International collaboration is critical to improve outcomes in this rare disease.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantPleural NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPneumonectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeExtrapleural pneumonectomyMesotheliomaPleurectomy/decorticationPrognostic factorsStaging

Identifiers

PMID37567386
PMCPMC11168491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.