Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37567334›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2024

Blunted Neurobehavioral Loss Anticipation Predicts Relapse to Stimulant Drug Use.

Leili Mortazavi, Kelly H MacNiven, Brian Knutson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Females have shorter scalp-to-cortex distances and receive stronger TMS electrical fields: Implications for clinical treatment.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced motor network engagement during reward gain anticipation in fibromyalgia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leili MortazaviDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Kelly H MacNivenDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Brian KnutsonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: knutson@stanford.edu.
Palo Alto University · US

Funding

Training CoreP50DA042012 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Karl A. Deisseroth · 2017 to 2026
$27.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA042012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with stimulant use disorder experience high rates of relapse. While neurobehavioral mechanisms involved in initiating drug use have been studied extensively, less research has focused on relapse.

methodsTo assess motivational processes involved in relapse and diagnosis, we acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging responses to nondrug (monetary) gains and losses in detoxified patients with stimulant use disorder (n = 68) and community control participants (n = 42). In a prospective multimodal design, we combined imaging of brain function, brain structure, and behavior to longitudinally track subsequent risk for relapse.

resultsAt the 6-month follow-up assessment, 27 patients remained abstinent, but 33 had relapsed. Patients with blunted anterior insula (AIns) activity during loss anticipation were more likely to relapse, an association that remained robust after controlling for potential confounds (i.e., craving, negative mood, years of use, age, and gender). Lower AIns activity during loss anticipation was associated with lower self-reported negative arousal to loss cues and slower behavioral responses to avoid losses, which also independently predicted relapse. Furthermore, AIns activity during loss anticipation was associated with the structural coherence of a tract connecting the AIns and the nucleus accumbens, as was functional connectivity between the AIns and nucleus accumbens during loss processing. However, these neurobehavioral responses did not differ between patients and control participants.

conclusionsTaken together, the results of the current study show that neurobehavioral markers predicted relapse above and beyond conventional self-report measures, with a cross-validated accuracy of 72.7%. These findings offer convergent multimodal evidence that implicates blunted avoidance motivation in relapse to stimulant use and may therefore guide interventions targeting individuals who are most vulnerable to relapse.

Indexed as

BrainSubstance-Related DisordersAnticipation, PsychologicalChronic DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotivationProspective StudiesRecurrenceRewardAddictionFunctional magnetic resonance imagingInsulaLossRelapseStimulant

Identifiers

PMID37567334
PMCPMC10840879
OpenAlexW4385708802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.