Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566561›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2023

Implementing a perioperative care of older people undergoing surgery (POPS) service: findings from a multi-site qualitative implementation study.

Justin Waring, Graham P Martin, Peter Hartley, Judith S L Partridge, Jugdeep K Dhesi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Stigma of concerns about falling among older adults.European geriatric medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Geriatric Models of Surgical Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin WaringHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Graham P MartinThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter HartleyThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-5897
Judith S L PartridgeDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College London, London, UK.
Jugdeep K DhesiDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College London, London, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Perioperative care for Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS) service model is increasingly being implemented across care providers in the English and Welsh National Health Services.

objectiveThe study aimed to produce evidence regarding clinical leaders' activities to implement POPS across different service contexts and to produce generalisable recommendations for future implementation.

methodsA qualitative interview study was undertaken across six National Health Services hospitals with established POPS services. Interview participants were recruited on the basis of their direct involvement in the implementation and leadership of the service. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with 26 people carried out between November 2022 and May 2023.

resultsThe implementation of POPS is often hampered by a lack of managerial and financial support, and apprehension amongst surgeons and anaesthetist about new ways of working. POPS leaders address these through five interconnected activities, each targeted at a combination of implementation factors. (i) Securing management and financial support. (ii) Professional engagement. (iii) Evidence building as a resource for demonstrating the clinical and operational benefits of POPS. (iv) Communication and engagement activities to promote and legitimise POPS to stakeholder groups. (v) Designated and distributed leadership to promote and coordinate implementation activities and to spread the service to new pathways.

conclusionsThrough a combination of activities POPS can be effectively implemented across different organisational contexts. Some aspects of these activities can be guided by shared resources and learning across sites, but others require adaption to local contextual barriers and drivers.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsPerioperative CareAgedHumansLeadershipQualitative Researchimplementationsimplementingolder peopleperioperative care of older people undergoing surgeryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37566561
PMCPMC10418147
OpenAlexW4385759689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.