Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566397›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

An Adjustable Magnetic Levator Prosthesis for Customizable Eyelid Re-Animation in Severe Blepharoptosis: Design and Proof-of-Concept.

Nish Mohith Kurukuti, Melanie Nadeau, Eleftherios I Paschalis, Kevin E Houston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04678115 (A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial Comparing Two Non-Surgical Treatments for Severe Blepharoptosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04678115 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial Comparing Two Non-Surgical Treatments for Severe Blepharoptosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryRan2021 to 2024Enrolled16ConditionsBlepharoptosis, Ptosis, Eyelid, Myasthenia Gravis, StrokeArmsMagnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP), Kinesiotape Frontalis Sling (KTFS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nish Mohith KurukutiSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Melanie NadeauSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eleftherios I PaschalisSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kevin E HoustonSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Immunopathogenesis of Adenovirus KeratitisR01EY013124 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI James Chodosh, Jaya Rajaiya · 2001 to 2026
$10.8M
Management of Blepharoptosis with Neodymium Magnet Systems: The Boston Blink-netic ProjectR01EY029437 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HOUSTON, KEVIN EDWARD · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013124NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Blepharoptosis is a common oculoplastic condition causing incomplete opening of the upper eyelid. Surgical approaches, the mainstay for correction, often fail to improve blink function. The purpose of this study was to develop a nonsurgical treatment option for severe ptosis that allows blink re-animation. Methods: Magnetic force required to perform blink re-animation was characterized by evaluation of eye-opening and closing using inter-palpebral fissure (IPF) outcomes with various combinations of eyelid array and box magnets. Optimal size of the spectacle magnet that achieved forces required for optimal blink dynamics was selected using simulation. The adjustable magnetic levator prosthesis (aMLP) included an eyelid array magnet and an adjustable rotating spectacle magnet that allowed change in the magnetic direction, thus changing the net magnetic interactive force between the magnets. The clinical feasibility of aMLP in improving eye opening without limiting eye closing was evaluated in patients with ptosis through a proof-of-concept study using IPF and comfort outcomes. Results: Optimal eye opening and closing was achieved by a magnet-array combination providing 45 grams of surface force (gF) in the tested ptosis population. The aMLP was able to modulate eye opening and closing with change in rotation of the spectacle magnet in two patients with ptotis. The best fitting of an aMLP improved IPF opening without limiting eye closing and with good comfort reported. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that the an aMLP can correct ptosis without adversely affecting blink function. Further evaluation in a larger patient population is warranted. Translational Relevance: A nonsurgical, proof of concept, adjustable magnetic treatment option for blink re-animation in patients with severe ptosis is presented.

Indexed as

BlepharoptosisEyelidsHumansMagnetic PhenomenaProstheses and Implants

Identifiers

PMID37566397
PMCPMC10424798
OpenAlexW4385752260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.