ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023
Developing rights-based standards for children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions: using a collaborative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder approach to build consensus.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Guideline
- A Systematic Review on Children's Participation in Healthcare From a Child's Perspective.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of tablet-based augmented reality on anxiety, fear, and pain during venipuncture in children: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Navigating communication barriers in phlebotomy: Strategies and ethical tensions in routine care.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- The Use of Extended Reality Distraction Methods During Needle-Related Procedures in Pediatric Hospital Care-Children's Experiences.Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN · 2026Article
- Enhancing neonatal vascular access: proposing a patient-centered framework based on 7-Rights.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Youth Participation, Agency and Well-Being in Hospital-Linked Contexts: Evidence From the KIDS Programme.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Designing and Validating Cuidador Web App for Self-Reported Pain among Children and Adolescents in Oncology Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Restraining hospitalized children for procedures: practices of nursing professionals in Brazil.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Community engagement in health guidelines and other normative products: a methodological review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Review
- Rights-Based Priorities for Children with SEND in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Multi-Method, Multi-Phased, Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Approach.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Psychological Safety During Medical Procedures Among Individuals Diagnosed with Chronic Illness in Childhood.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Procedural sedation competencies: a review and multidisciplinary international consensus statement on knowledge, skills, training, and credentialing.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Review
- Swedish translation of the iSUPPORT rights-based standards to support paediatric patients having a clinical procedure.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Visual CARE Measure for assessing children's perceptions of nurses' empathy.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- "Some Kind of Magic?" How Adaptive Experts Navigate Complexity in Pediatric Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- Paediatric patient perceptions of healthcare professionals: contributions to a communication curriculum.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children continue to experience harm when undergoing clinical procedures despite increased evidence of the need to improve the provision of child-centred care. The international ISupport collaboration aimed to develop standards to outline and explain good procedural practice and the rights of children within the context of a clinical procedure. The rights-based standards for children undergoing tests, treatments, investigations, examinations and interventions were developed using an iterative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder consensus building approach. This consensus approach used a range of online and face to face methods across three phases to ensure ongoing engagement with multiple stakeholders. The views and perspectives of 203 children and young people, 78 parents and 418 multi-disciplinary professionals gathered over a two year period (2020-2022) informed the development of international rights-based standards for the care of children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions. The standards are the first to reach international multi-stakeholder consensus on definitions of supportive and restraining holds. Conclusion: This is the first study of its kind which outlines international rights-based procedural care standards from multi-stakeholder perspectives. The standards offer health professionals and educators clear evidence-based tools to support discussions and practice changes to challenge prevailing assumptions about holding or restraining children and instead encourage a focus on the interests and rights of the child. What is Known: • Children continue to experience short and long-term harm when undergoing clinical procedures despite increased evidence of the need to improve the provision of child-centred care. • Professionals report uncertainty and tensions in applying evidence-based practice to children's procedural care. What is New: • This is the first study of its kind which has developed international rights-based procedural care standards from multi-stakeholder perspectives. • The standards are the first to reach international multi-stakeholder consensus on definitions of supportive and restraining holds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.